The National Catholic Review
Preventing a Holocaust

I know not how it happened, but your editorial “Diplomacy and Disarma-ment” (9/24) fails to mention that Iran has threatened genocide on the Israelis not once but many times. Yet somehow the United States and Israel are found morally lacking and must “come up to snuff” before taking steps to prevent Iran from perpetuating in one hour a greater holocaust than Hitler’s final solution? Ridiculous.

Kevin Murphy

New York, N.Y.

Seek Peace, Not Power

Thank you for your clear-headed editorial on Iran. Unfortunately the hawks are out flying again, ready to commit the United States to more war, more sacrifice and more division. But for what? We have no threat from Iran. We cannot be a true world leader without respect for morality, justice and equality.

And there is the issue of our own belief. How can a military strike against Iran be reconciled with “turning the other cheek, putting away our sword, loving our neighbor”? At times we overwhelm ourselves with our exceptionalism. We don’t have to follow the rules; we just make them. Have the last 10 years of useless war not taught us anything? Let’s hope and pray we can someday become a nation that really seeks peace, not power.

Bob DuBrul

Asheville, N.C.

What Sister Didn’t Say

Re “Political Thrill-Seeking” (Current Comment, 9/24): At the Democratic National Convention, Simone Campbell, S.S.S., executive director of Network, applauded Democratic economic policies as being “pro-life” and “aligned with Catholic values.” She equates “I am my brother’s keeper” with the obligation that this be carried out by the federal government.

Absent from Sister Campbell’s speech was any mention of abortion, which the Democratic platform en-dorses. She also failed to mention the controversial mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Catholic bishops and other faith leaders warn that the mandate threatens our religious liberty.

Sister Campbell did not give a truthful speech to millions of people. Her views do not reflect authentic Catholic teaching. As a consecrated religious in the Catholic Church, she is creating scandal. There should be consequences.

Lucy Dartley

Ashburn, Va.

The Greatest Clergy

Thanks for the kind reference to my new book, The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame (Current Comment, 9/24). You list Abraham Heschel, Martin Luther King Jr. and James Lawson as members of the clergy among the 100 people profiled in the book. Others listed include Norman Thomas, A. J. Muste, William Sloane Coffin, Bill Moyers and Jesse Jackson. Myles Horton went to Union Theological Seminary but was never ordained.

I’m a big fan of Saul Alinsky, but he was hardly a saint! He could be callous and abusive toward people. Dorothy Day, also known for being difficult, is a stronger candidate for sainthood.

Peter Dreier

Los Angeles, Calif.

Citizens of the World

I appreciated your editorial “The Education We Deserve” (9/10), on the importance of a liberal education. One area missing from the list, however, is the great need in our day for graduates to have had an exposure to the global world. This includes world religions, cultures across the world, the poverty that exists in so many areas and the many contributions that diverse cultures have made and are making to the society that we enjoy. Truly education, particularly higher education, has to prepare students to be citizens of the world.

Mariah Snyder

Saint Paul, Minn.

Preaching Immanence

Re “As It Is in Heaven,” by Edward McCormack (9/10): Surely the quality of preaching is important, but the image of God that one preaches is of first importance. Often preaching misses the truth that God is not only transcendent but also immanent. Why is this important? If I only know the God who resides in highest heaven, then I will think of “getting to heaven” as my prime concern.

By contrast, if I am aware of the Trinity as immanent and that my human vocation is to be drawn into Trinitarian participation, into kenosis, the outpouring of love, then love of nature, creation and of all humanity is my vocation. I no longer worry about heaven but am focused on gratefully sharing the love that is the birthright of all creation. Is there a better way to constitute a new heaven and a new earth?

Barbara Rietberg

Pompano Beach, Fla.

It Was Not an Abortion

In “Phoenix Hospital Controversy Continues” (Signs of the Times, 9/10), America describes the disputed medical situation as follows: “...a woman’s placenta was removed and her child died as a result.” Precisely! This is the only description I know of in the Catholic press that got it right. So, kudos!

This was not an abortion. There was no desire to kill the fetus. The placenta was killing both the mother and the baby. Removing the fetus but not the placenta would not have saved the mother’s life. Catholic moral theory addresses this kind of situation. Removing the fetus was an undesired consequence of the act—removing the placenta—that saved the mother’s life. It was not an abortion and never should have been expressed in this way—by detractors or defenders.

To some extent the ignorance of biology is excusable; we can’t be experts on everything. But it is not excusable for a bishop who acts out of that ignorance and by doing so, excommunicates an innocent nun.

Robert P. Heaney, M.D.

Omaha, Neb.

Beauty Transformed Me

Re “Woven from Light,” by Judith Dupré (9/10): We cannot underestimate the power of beauty to transform. Every day on my way to work I pass by the magnificent Cathedral of Christ the Light. In fact, I watched its construction. The cathedral is nothing short of stunning. At first, I had no idea it was a Catholic church. Not being Catholic, I shyly entered one day and was deeply touched, even transfixed, by the unusual interior. I was so impressed that I brought my non-Catholic parents to visit the cathedral, and they too were astonished by its beauty. I am now seriously considering becoming Catholic, and I daresay this beautiful cathedral played a part in drawing me near.

Sherry Walter

Oakland, Calif.

Comments

GERALD KENJORSKI | 10/3/2012 - 5:12pm
Terri Shawhan is justified in her wish that her "validly cast vote will not be disenfranchised by others who are not eligible to vote;" and a valid voter's ID is a reasonable requirement. But to set up this requirment just months before election day
when thousands of citizens would find it difficult to get the ID, is irresponsible. To claim the law is needed to prevent voter fraud is questionable, since only one case of voter fraud has been alleged in the past ten years (in PA). The public statement of a state legislator, after the passage of the ID legislation, that this would help assure that Romney would carry PA, indicates the real motives of legislators more than anything they may have said on the floor on the legislative chamber. Let the law stand; but postpone enforcement until after the presidential election to allow time for citizens to acquire the necessary ID. 
PEGGY KRUSE | 9/28/2012 - 8:32pm
This is not for publication because I don't have time to compose a good letter. However, in response to the first letter, I'd like someone to know that Iran's desire for Israel to be 'wiped off the face of the map' does not necessarily mean they want to kill Israelis. My husband worked in Saudi Arabia in 1992 and Saudi Arabia's censors already take Israel, which they consider "occupied Palestine," off the map by blacking out the word Israel on all maps in books and magazines. Of course, they also black out 'women's shameful body parts,' such as necklines and arms. It is obviously not good that the State of Israel is not recognized in the Muslim world, but I cannot understand why there is not a better explanation of the situation.

Recently in Letters