The Midwest Jesuits plan to appeal a decree by Archbishop Charles Thompson of Indianapolis that Brebeuf Jesuit High School is no longer recognized as a Catholic school after the school’s administrators refused to terminate a teacher in a same-sex marriage as requested by the archdiocese. In a statement released on June 20, Father Brian Paulson, provincial of the Midwest Province of Jesuits, said the order “will appeal this decision through the formal appeal process established in church law: first, pursuing local recourse to the archbishop, and, if necessary, hierarchical recourse to the Vatican.”
According to the archbishop’s decree, Brebeuf Jesuit High School “can no longer use the name Catholic and will no longer be identified or recognized as a Catholic institution by the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.”
The canonical appeal process, which starts at the diocesan level and can then proceed to the Vatican if not resolved locally, will unfold over the next month or more, and is likely to involve several complicated issues concerning both the relationship between religious orders and diocesan bishops and also a bishop’s responsibility for oversight of Catholic education within his diocese.
Kurt Martens, a canon law professor at the Catholic University of America, says the bishop does have the canonical right to take away the title “Catholic” from a school in his territory but this case is murky.
Canon law stipulates three ways in which a school can be understood as Catholic: if it is “under the control of the competent ecclesiastical authority or of a public ecclesiastical juridical person, or one which in a written document is acknowledged as Catholic by the ecclesiastical authority.”
“[Brebeuf] is a Catholic school which is being directed by a public juridical person, which is the Jesuits,” explained Dr. Martens. “If it is a diocesan school, then it is clear that the bishop would have control. But when you get to the level of religious, what is the control that a bishop still has?” That is not clear, says Dr. Martens.
In an interview with America, Father Paulson said, “I acknowledge that the archbishop definitely has the right to decide what ministries/apostolates in the archdiocese can call themselves Catholic.” He says that where the province and Brebeuf differ with the archdiocese is on what degree of autonomy in personnel decisions is appropriate for a school operated by a religious order, in accordance with a religious order’s right, also recognized in canon law, to direct its own apostolates.
According to canon 806, the bishop has the right to “watch over” and “inspect” Catholic schools in his territory, even those directed by religious orders. However, “they retain their autonomy in the internal management of their schools,” the canon continues.
Father Paulson said that “Brebeuf and the Midwest Province believe that the archbishop’s request that the school not renew the teacher’s contract is neither a prudent nor necessary exercise of his responsibility to oversee ‘faith and morals’ as well as Catholic education within the archdiocese.”
Canon law recognizes a bishop’s right to “appoint or to approve teachers of religion and, if religious or moral considerations require it, the right to remove them or to demand that they be removed.” It also notes that the bishop is “to be careful that those who are appointed as teachers of religion in schools, even non-Catholic ones, are outstanding in true doctrine, in the witness of the Christian life and in their teaching ability.”
The archdiocese said in their statement, “The Archdiocese of Indianapolis recognizes all teachers, guidance counselors and administrators as ministers.” Father Verbryke said in a live video interview with America that while Brebeuf would apply such a standard for “the president, the principal, campus ministers [and] religion teachers,” they would not use it as the “yardstick” for other teachers, and it is “because this particular teacher is not a religion teacher or campus minster that we felt that we could not in conscience dismiss him from employment.”
Father Paulson says that the archbishop wants all Catholic schools in Indianapolis to include language in their contracts and handbooks defining every teacher as a minister. His understanding is that this approach is meant to guarantee that schools “have the right in civil law not to hire and to fire/not renew employees whose lives do not conform to Catholic doctrine.” By recognizing all employees as ministers, Father Paulson said a school would be able to invoke “the ‘ministerial exemption’ in civil law in regards to discrimination.”
“Brebeuf chooses not to take this approach,” said Father Paulson.
While looking for all employees to be supportive of the Catholic mission of Brebeuf, Father Paulson explained that the school would take “more of an ‘all things considered’ determination of the faith, morals, character, talent and ability to contribute to the mission of the school” when determining whether to retain employees. Thus, while recognizing that “this teacher’s marriage is not in conformity with church doctrine,” Father Paulson said that Brebeuf believes “the teacher makes a valuable contribution to the mission of the school.”
Dr. Martens says that the Jesuits have 10 days to appeal the decree once it is issued. (The decree was issued on June 21.) “They will have to ask the bishop to reconsider and the bishop has 30 days to respond.”
In those 30 days, the archbishop’s decree is not automatically suspended, and the school will continue to be under its limitations. However, canon law stipulates that the Jesuits have the right to ask for a suspension of the decree while the recourse is in progress and the archbishop can either grant a suspension or not. If the archbishop declines the request for suspension, the Jesuits can also appeal that decision to a higher authority.
If, after 30 days, the archbishop declines the appeal altogether, the Jesuits can take the case to the Vatican, Dr. Martens explained. Father Paulson indicated that the province would appeal the case to the Congregation for Catholic Education if necessary.
Would it be acceptable to Brebeuf's administration if a history or math teacher at their school worked part time at an abortion clinic. Let's say the teacher in question said that in their conscience they believe a woman has a right to choose and should be afforded proper medical care.
The married couple are not destroying life. Actually enriching life. May God continue to Bless them.
Amen
Will Nier: They’re not “married”. You’re not Catholic. Jesus instituted the sacrament of Holy Matrimony, the sodomitic male couple are not valid in Jesus’ eyes. If you don’t like the sacraments you’re not Catholic and take it up with Jesus that you disagree with Him. It’s not “love” to commit sodomy.
Dale Athlon: What planet do you live on? What century are you from? There has been progress in the last century. Homosexuals are free to be who they are in the USA and in many, if not most, countries in the world. There are some countries, however, that still, still, still enshrine ignorance, prejudice and hatred to the point of imprisoning queer people. How sad. How foolish. How unChrist-like of them. I can’t believe I am wasting my time with people who think and feel like you. Peace, Brother...
They create no life. They cannot create life, perversion precludes life.
Rhett Segall
As a cradle Catholic educated in Catholic schools, I have long watched bishops make ludicrous, meaningless, and bigoted decisions that lack any message from the Gospel of Christ.
Please spare me the excuse of being outside Catholic teaching. Catholic schools and churches are filled with people who are not faithful to all the Church’s credos. If the bishops expelled all these people, very few churches would exist.
On a positive note, at least we no longer condemn these people to be burned alive in front of all the villagers.
Judith Jordan: You’re not Catholic, you’re a heretic. See following
Being a follower of Jesus means you follow the Gospel. Sticking a male reproductive organ into another man’s execretory tract or mouth is not what Jesus ever taught, please get mental help and stay away from children. 😦
Dale Athlon: You are one sick person... crude and cruel, and closed-minded. Good Bye.
I see you want all your children for yourself. I’m not into children. Moreover your children are probably as ugly as you are and always will be.
Even though it's a "legal" thing how one can blanket all teachers as ministers is redictulous. Many schools have non-Catholics on staff teaching non-religious subjects. Are they Catholic ministers? Likewise on the college level there is even more diversity even in theology departments. Nothing would have been said about two heterosexual teachers being divorced or living together. Our bishops are obsessed with sex.
My husband and I, along with our large family endeavor to live in accordance with the teachings of our Faith. Perceiving that by sending our children over the years to a Catholic school, a privilege that we have paid an absolute fortune to do, as opposed to pursing a public education, our justification has always been that being a Catholic setting, they should support us faithwise as. I recall on one occasion my 9 year old daughter coming home and telling her Dad and I, that the Music teacher had shared with the class (owing to her change in surname) that she was in a new relationship now with her boyfriend, (outside of Marriage!), on account of her recent divorce with her former husband. Children of this age are very impressionable, and when any school states that teaching staff, as a condition of their employment, simply support the Catholic teaching and not say things out of line with it, surely this should be respected, otherwise the staffer can teach elsewhere. The gay gentleman in the story above clearly revealed his situation to the school community, thus letting not just the Jesuit staff know, but likely families attending there as well, many of whom would have felt this was wrong, thus their concerns raised to the Archbishop. You say that the Bishops are obsessed with sex, but would you also make this accusation against Jesus, when he promoted good relationships between men and women in the institution of Marriage? I have never regarded one's faith as a smorgasbord of choice of what to follow, but if we are to reject the Catholic teaching publicly and in an educational setting involving young children, what should any Archbishop whose vocation does include shepherding his flock, to do? And what of parents/families in that community, to think of any Church Leader coming out to defend sin? Please, you need to think this issue through more deeply - the Archbishop is only acting within the confines of his role; it is the Jesuit community who are failing their school community!
I would argue that if you are uncomfortable with the position of the Jesuits in this instance, the first thing you should do is make sure non of your family attends a Jesuit institution. The issue here is not the sexual inclinations of faculty. The issue is whether a duly authorized entity has the absolute right to interprete the rules of the Catholic Church and to establish policies and protocols to accomplish their mission. I cannot recall a passage in which Jesus spoke about homosexuality. I can recall the great commandment: love one another as I have loved you.
In similar fashion, will the bishop now remove all gay ministers from all practices in the Church? We know that there are gay priests and religious, ought we to turn them out? Maybe we should.
Please stop with the "Jesus never said anything about" argument. He didn't mention incest either but that doesn't mean He'd be comfortable with siblings having sex. Jesus affirmed the Mosaic law, which prohibited homosexual relation. Also, His command to love one another didn't pertain to sexual relations.
“Love one another as I have loved you” is such a simple, beautiful concept. Why don’t we just follow his lead???!!! It’s all about love. And we think it’s about everything else...
Sheila gray: I know a Chicago cop and he says gay male domestic disturbance calls are the worst things he witnesses. Brutal physical violence. Unstable unions and pervert lust, it’s not “love”. Perversion can never be loving, since it’s based on beastly conduct,
Dale athlon: What, Sir, is your problem? You are a hater, and you know nothing about queer life. I know many, many gay men who you know nothing about. You know nothing about our communities. Queer people all over this country, approximately 40 million of us, are way beyond your limitations. We are doing good and raising children who will leave people who think like you in the dust. Au Revoir. Queer people are awesome
St. Ignatius is repulsed by Jesuit homoperversion today. It’s deplorable.
Grow up, Dale. Some people might wonder why you are such a homo-hater. I don’t wonder at all. Someone made you hate. I hope you heal before your life ends.
Takes one to know one, Sheila.
What is wrong with all of you, making such hateful comments about almost One Billion people?Yes. There are probably close to one billion queer people on Planet Earth. If you are Catholic, if this is how many Catholics feel about queer people, then what’s the point? There Is No Love In Your Withered Heart. I’m outraged at the ugly, viscous comments. It’s sick.
Peter, please correct me if I am wrong on the facts. I thought the Archdiocese acted against the school for refusing to terminate the employment of a teacher that was married to a person of the same-sex, not because he is gay.
Anne Jeremy
As a cradle Catholic educated in Catholic schools, I have long watched some bishops make ludicrous, meaningless, and bigoted decisions that lack any message from the Gospel of Christ.
Please spare me the excuse of being outside Catholic teaching. Catholic schools and churches are filled with people who are not faithful to all the Church’s credos. If the bishops expelled all these people, very few churches would exist.
On a positive note, at least we no longer condemn these people to be burned alive in front of all the villagers.
Wow. That simple, is it? Apparently, the Jesuits are not prejudiced against homosexuals. Good.
It’s not love or merciful to allow people to live beastly lives and die young and have depression and STDs and abuse alcohol and drugs and consider suicide. Save them from mortal sin. That is fraternal love, to save people from damnation and promote being like Jesus who never would commit sodomy. Get real.
What is going on? How dare you?! You know NOTHING!!! You realize, don’t you, that your heart is filled with hatred for millions of people? And that is OK? Homosexuals make up approximately 10-15 percent of the human population. God Made Us This Way. Get over yourself, please.
Deeming all teachers "ministers" is just a legal mechanism to get out of non-discrimination lawsuits ... it's a way to sidestep teachers' legal rights. I hope the Jesuit school keeps standing up for the teacher!
The Jesuits are supposed to help people. Instead they leave the teacher in mortal sin? They leave the teacher on a path to Hell, not heaven. If the Jesuits at Brebeuf were Catholic they’d be CONVERTING the teacher to Jesus Christ and the Gospel, not confirming the teacher is what is disgusting satanic sin. We sure live in bizarre times where everything is upside down, and self-righteous people are here trying to call male homogenital copulation: “love” that’s Christ-like? Jesus never promoted anything but male & female and the God-created natural reproductive use of sex organs.
Why are Jesuits and grads allying with beastly disordered lifestyles?
Just to add, if I was a parent I would never send my child to a Catholic school. I wouldn't want them to absorb the misogyny, homophobia, and reactionary sexual attitudes that characterize conservative Catholic thought. Education shouldn't mean indoctrination.
Crystal, indoctrination is exactly what education is about. Kids can learn facts anywhere. What public, private or religious education does is indoctrinate them into the mores and ethics of society. It does tell them how to act and with whom. Along with parents it teaches right and wrong. If that isn't indoctrination, I am not sure what is. Finally, education teaches us to think for ourselves. Its the whole purpose of school.
I agree school should teach kids to think critically and for themselves, but the Catholic church doesn't do that.
Peter, indoctrination is exactly what education is not, and never should be. Open your mind, Sir. Education is about enabling students to be all they can be. It’s about pointing young minds to LIFE, and all it can be. Thank God for these Jesuits!!!
Crystal: send your kids to public school to learn hip-hop, drug use, sex & abortion. I sincerely hope you aren’t around children,
What the archbishop did is an abomination. He stands in direct opposition to Christs command to love and certainly is a slap in the face to Pope Francis who so wonderfully stated so clearly: " Who am I to Judge.". The archbishop must be forced to step down. No reason at all that this teacher should loose his job he is validly married and recognized as such by the law of the land and I would say the eye of God. The Church must learn to be inclusive and acceptance to all God's children
Jesus or the Apostles would never accept or promote men inserting their male reproductive organs into another man’s orafice. You aren’t Catholic.
Jesus never said anything about sex
He talked about Marriage (male and female) many times. He said that if a man lusts after another, he’s already committed adultery. He said if your hand or eye caused you to sin, get rid of it. You get the picture. No way did Christ condone man-on-man homogenital contact and acts.
My husband and I are monitoring this case very carefully as are several of our married gay friends at our parish. It gives us much needed hope. Truly. Most Married Catholic Heterosexuals have statistically failed at embodying and defending the Sacrament of Marriage. Catholic Baby Boomers have decimated the Sacrament of Marriage. Thus it is pure hubris that some of them would take umbrage that we gays dare to do what they have demonstrably failed to do.
The scandal here is that the US Bishops are burdening the laity with yokes not even they can fulfill. The married gay teacher at the high school, like my husband and me, are role modeling to the world that a gay marriage can be as holy, loving, sacramental and licit as any other marriage except procreation. We gays do not relish being gay for that would mean welcoming a life of scorn, ridicule, alienation and exclusion. No one would willingly choose such a state in life. Alas we have 3 options: suicide, castration or try with all of our might to be happy in spite of being “disordered”. To the Bishops I say: HYPOCRITES! Get your house in order and live honest lives with integrity. We Catholic married gays do. Something about people in glass houses.
Bravo to you.
Are you actually trying to say gay men are holy & monogamous?! Lol, gay men are lustful vice perverts of the highest order and have the poz, STD, and lower life expectancy to prove their inferior lifestyles.
Are you suggesting that Catholic Church should stop encouraging its followers to live up to the heightened standards imposed by God because its a burden that is hard to achieve?
Jose, Are you suggesting that the Catholic Church should stop encouraging its followers of living up to the heightened standards imposed by God because these standards are a burden that is impossible to achieve?
Great Irony here. All those Bishop Closet Cases who don't have the BALLS to be honest about their own proclivities while passing judgement on gay persons with real courage.
Every one of these fools masturbates into a bathroom sink and they have deluded themselves into thinking that they are respected elders of the Church? I doubt it.
My fullest support to the Jesuits. Who is the Bishop to judge, if Francis himself says he will not? Do you honestly think that the high school age kids in this day and age are in some kind of moral danger because a gay teacher is in their school? Do you now think they are old enough to parse out what are the real questions to be answered here, and that there teacher is not doing the job for which he was employed - and most likely represents for them someone trying to live a moral life, perhaps of heroic virtue in their circumstances? However, the one thing I am sure that these kids can zone in on and identify immediately is hypocrisy.
It’s the bishop’s job to judge. You judge too. You probably hate cigarette smokers and “racists”, right? Stop judging! Racists are ok, just like gay sodomy males. Let them both around kids!
It’s the bishop’s job to judge. You judge too. You probably hate cigarette smokers and “racists”, right? Stop judging!!! Racists are ok, just like gay sodomy males. Let them both around kids!!
Bravo to the Archbishop!!! Anyone who thinks Jesus promoted men inserting their reproductive organs into another man’s execretory tract and inseminating it needs their head examined. Oh, how Satanic and beastly the Jesuits are today. How dumb and utterly stupid their supporters are.
Did former miltary man St Ignatius who talked about Hell in the Spiritual Exercises support his men doing sodomy?
If you love someone, you stop them from committing such degrading acts. Pope Francis means nothing, he’s a heretic. I’m embarrassed to be a Jesuit grad, they nothing but perverts today.
I hated my years at Jesuit because of a piece of excremental like you. He too was obsessed with anal sex. I had never heard of it, but he accused me of doing it when I was 12. I hope your children abandon you to an abusive nursing home. I hope you die alone and neglected.
The above post by Frank Elliott is pure hatred. Totally intolerant. Incapable of dialogue with others.