Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Pope Francis uses incense to bless a bronze reliquary containing bone fragments believed to belong to St. Peter the Apostle during a Mass in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican Nov. 24, 2013. A debate has ignited after three Italian researchers published a paper asserting that St. Peter’s remains may have been -- and continue to be -- buried in catacombs under the Mausoleum of St. Helena, rather than under St. Peter's Basilica. (CNS photo/L'Osservatore Romano)

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The remains of St. Peter may have been and possibly still could be buried in catacombs under the Mausoleum of St. Helena after being moved from the Vatican hillside during anti-Christian persecutions in the third century, according to a paper published recently by three Italian researchers.

Labeling their conclusions as "conjecture," the researchers suggested archaeologists could "validate" their findings with "excavation campaigns"; however, a leading expert in Christian archaeology and a member of the Pontifical Commission for Sacred Archaeology told Vatican News that the researchers' hypothesis was "unacceptable."

Emperor Constantine would never have gone through so much logistical trouble building St. Peter's Basilica in the early fourth century "if it had not been contingent upon the presence of the venerated remains" below, where the saint's tomb had been venerated since early Christian times, Vincenzo Fiocchi Nicolai told Vatican News May 30.

"It is clear," he said, "that Peter's remains were found in the place of the original burial site on the Vatican hill when the formidable Constantinian basilica was built, the biggest basilica ever established in the city," he said, adding that if later the remains had been moved "ad catacumbasto," then that refers to a cemetery on the Appian Way, later called, the catacombs of St. Sebastian.

A leading expert in Christian archaeology and a member of the Pontifical Commission for Sacred Archaeology told Vatican News that the researchers' hypothesis was "unacceptable."

Fiocchi Nicolai's comments were a response to a paper titled, "The Search of St. Peter's Memory ad catacumbas in the Cemeterial Area ad Duos Lauros in Rome," published in early March in Heritage, a journal of cultural and natural heritage science.

The researchers highlighted the lengthy quest by archeologists to prove where St. Peter had been buried but added that the debate was still open as to where his remains could be found.

"The most accepted opinion is that Peter's remains were moved in one of the Roman catacombs," they wrote, but added that "archeological evidence seems to exclude" the common hypothesis that St. Peter's remains were kept "for a certain period" in the catacombs on Via Appia.

By referring to early Christian texts, maps of the catacombs, a fourth-century marble sepulchral inscription of "Petri" and the orientation of the above ground basilica and mausoleum Constantine had built for his mother, St. Helena, the researchers claim "the last catacomb that has housed, or may still house today, St. Peter's remains ... is definitely that of the Sts. Marcellinus and Peter," located on the ancient Via Labicana. St. Marcellinus was a priest and St. Peter was an exorcist, who both died in 304 during the Diocletianic persecution.

While scholars are certain St. Peter's ancient tomb was located on the Vatican hill where he had died a martyr and where Constantine ordered a basilica be built, his remains have been a source of much controversy and mystery.

"The presence of Peter's remains in the catacombs of Sts. Marcellinus and Peter, therefore, would directly and simply explain why Constantine built the complex basilica and mausoleum in that area," the researchers wrote. They referred to a seventh-century copy of the Liber Pontificalis -- Book of the Popes -- that said that the basilica was "dedicated to St. Peter the Apostle (Beato Petro), martyred with Marcellinus."

And one burial "cubicle" below has a fresco depicting St. Peter holding a scroll, they wrote.

Fiocchi Nicolai told Vatican News that the reasoning the authors used to posit that the location was dedicated to St. Peter the Apostle was "acrobatic and, in fact, based on nothing."

The term "beatus" is a common term in the Liber Pontificalis to refer to every saint, and the burial inscription of a "Petri" whose date of death is the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul is a coincidence, he said, since the name "Petrus" is very common.

While scholars are certain St. Peter's ancient tomb was located on the Vatican hill where he had died a martyr and where Constantine ordered a basilica be built, his remains have been a source of much controversy and mystery.

St. Paul VI announced in 1968 that the "relics" of St. Peter had been "identified in a way which we can hold to be convincing," after bones were discovered following excavations of the necropolis under St. Peter's Basilica, which began in the 1940s near a monument erected in the fourth century to honor St. Peter.

The pope had cases of the relics placed beneath the basilica's main altar and in his private chapel in the Apostolic Palace. Scientists have confirmed the remains are those of a 60- to 70-year-old robust male, according to Vatican News.

More: Saints / Vatican

We don’t have comments turned on everywhere anymore. We have recently relaunched the commenting experience at America and are aiming for a more focused commenting experience with better moderation by opening comments on a select number of articles each day.

But we still want your feedback. You can join the conversation about this article with us in social media on Twitter or Facebook, or in one of our Facebook discussion groups for various topics.

Or send us feedback on this article with one of the options below:

We welcome and read all letters to the editor but, due to the volume received, cannot guarantee a response.

In order to be considered for publication, letters should be brief (around 200 words or less) and include the author’s name and geographic location. Letters may be edited for length and clarity.

We open comments only on select articles so that we can provide a focused and well-moderated discussion on interesting topics. If you think this article provides the opportunity for such a discussion, please let us know what you'd like to talk about, or what interesting question you think readers might want to respond to.

If we decide to open comments on this article, we will email you to let you know.

If you have a message for the author, we will do our best to pass it along. Note that if the article is from a wire service such as Catholic News Service, Religion News Service, or the Associated Press, we will not have direct contact information for the author. We cannot guarantee a response from any author.

We welcome any information that will help us improve the factual accuracy of this piece. Thank you.

Please consult our Contact Us page for other options to reach us.

City and state/province, or if outside Canada or the U.S., city and country. 
When you click submit, this article page will reload. You should see a message at the top of the reloaded page confirming that your feedback has been received.

The latest from america

“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyce, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024
In 1984, then-associate editor Thomas J. Reese, S.J., explained in depth how bishops are selected—from the initial vetting process to final confirmation by the pope and the bishop himself.
Thomas J. ReeseNovember 21, 2024