Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
People walk near the Hualcan Glacier in the Ancash region of Peru Nov. 29. Peru is hosting the annual U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP20) in Lima Dec. 1-12. (CNS photo/ Mariana Bazo, Reuters)

The agreement reached at the end of the most recent round of international negotiations for a new climate-change treaty fails to protect the poorest and most vulnerable countries, Catholic observers said.

The accord fell far short of a call from Catholic bishops from around the world to take strong measures to reduce global warming, said Meera Ghani, policy and democracy officer for climate justice at CIDSE, an international consortium of Catholic development agencies.

"The outcome is extremely weak," Ghani told Catholic News Service. "What we thought would be glimmers of hope developing into something substantial never happened."

The U.N. climate change summit was meant to pave the way to negotiations next year in Paris for an agreement to take effect in 2020, when the Kyoto Protocol expires. The talks began here Dec. 1, but on Dec. 12, when the summit was scheduled to end, negotiators from more than 190 countries wrangled for another 30 hours over how industrialized countries and developing nations should split responsibilities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the costs of adapting to a changing climate and compensation for losses and damage resulting from climate change.

Because the economies of many countries—particularly China and India—have grown dramatically in the past decade, delegates from industrialized countries argued that those countries should bear a larger share of the burden.

Negotiators from some developing countries agreed, while others objected. The vague language they finally agreed on could leave the poorest countries bearing a disproportionate share of the cost as they struggle with high poverty rates and the impacts of climate-change-related droughts and floods, Ghani said.

Bishops from around the world sent a letter to the negotiators Dec. 10, calling for them to take steps to keep global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. That is even lower than the two-degree level that an international panel of scientists warned would have irreversible consequences.

The letter was signed by representatives of organizations of bishops' conferences in Asia, Africa and Latin America; representatives of the bishops' conferences of Peru, Brazil and France; and three individual bishops from Peru.

The bishops called for the delegates to "put an end to the fossil fuel era" and to consider the "ethical and moral dimensions of climate change," as well as technical issues.

The bishops also urged the negotiators to help the most vulnerable countries adapt to climate change impacts, which scientists say include melting glaciers, more extreme flooding and drought. A new agreement, they said, must include "new models of development and lifestyles that are both climate compatible and bring people out of poverty."

The bishops specifically urged negotiators to "adopt a fair and legally binding agreement based on universal human rights," phase in 100 percent renewable energy accessible to everyone, allocate 50 percent of public funds to help communities adapt to climate change, ensure that developed countries "share the necessary technology and know-how" to help with adaptation, and "adopt clear roadmaps" for future financing and transparent accounting.

"The bishops' statement was much more ambitious than anything on the (negotiating) table," Ghani said.

The bishops also committed themselves to contributing "to a lifestyle which frees us from a desire of appropriation and enables us to be respectful of the dignity of the person and the harmony of creation."

They said they would continue to "seek dialogue to bring the voices of the poor to the table of decision-makers."

"We are convinced that everyone has a capacity to contribute to overcome climate change and to choose sustainable lifestyles," they wrote.

"There's a lot of talk about climate change, but no talk about social change. An economic model that only seeks to extract natural resources for a highly technological, consumer-driven society can't sustain that lifestyle over the long term," Peruvian Archbishop Pedro Barreto Jimeno, president of the Latin American bishops' justice and solidarity department, told CNS. "Future generations will criticize our inhumane generation, which thinks only of the present and not of the future."

Catholic Church leaders have been speaking out strongly on climate issues in recent months. Pope Francis sent a letter to the delegates in Lima Dec. 11, and church leaders called for fair and equitable solutions at the U.N. climate conference in New York in September.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024