Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Kevin SpinaleJanuary 19, 2016

The last time I venerated a relic was at the baseball hall of fame in Cooperstown. In game six of the American League Championship Series, Curt Schilling pitched against the Yankees after undergoing a surgery intended to staple his injured ankle together. Schilling pitched masterfully, and the Red Sox won the game and the series the next day. Schilling’s performance seems that much more heroic because he pitched through pain and injury clearly manifest in the blood that soaked through his sock. When I saw the sock in a glass case at Cooperstown, I almost wept. The sock reminded me of the Red Sox victory. It was a visceral reminder of the joy that filled me after decades of embarrassing defeat on the part of the Red Sox franchise. This relic had great power. In fact, Schilling later sold a second bloody sock—from his performance in game two of the World Series—at auction for over $92,000. Like the relics of the church, modern relics retain tremendous power and value.

At the beginning of his most recent novel, Christopher Buckley offers a wonderful epigraph from Iris Murdoch. It reads: “Even if a dog’s tooth is truly worshipped it glows with light. The venerated object is endowed with power.” In the early decades of the 16th century, Catholic elites—ecclesial and otherwise—endowed relics not only with power but great value. Relics were and are precious traces of holy men and women, but they also held extraordinary monetary value. The most precious and powerful of relics attracted scores of pilgrims. Pilgrims sought the indulgences accrued by venerating relics, and those pilgrims with means paid for special access to relics and the spiritual assurance of indulgences. Atonement for sin was bought and sold. The money from the sale of indulgences helped consolidate ecclesial power and wealth. The system rested on the extraordinary value attached to relics and their power to draw the faithful in hope of atonement and healing.

Buckley’s novel is set in the turbulent years of 1517-19. It is a wonderful legend replete with historical figures and historical echoes to current realities in our own time 500 years later. Martin Luther’s protest against Rome and the relic-indulgence system provides the backdrop for a quest, a thrilling pursuit of a particular shroud of Jesus. There are many bad guys, a few good guys, a man trying to redeem himself and a woman whose courage, wisdom, and beauty harken back to an old Hollywood movie. Albrecht Durer, the great German painter, schemes with the novel’s main character, Dismas, a relic master serving a thoughtful German noble and a corrupt German cardinal on the rise and in debt to creditors, to dupe the German cardinal into purchasing a counterfeit relic for an extravagant sum. Dismas, named after the good thief in Luke’s account of Jesus’ passion, is eventually caught. Though Dismas escapes gruesome execution, he must fulfill a penance that should kill him. He is charged with translating a most holy relic from the possession of the Duke of Savoy to the ecclesial court of the German cardinal.

On one level, the novel entertains with a thrilling cast of characters, violence, vulgarity and a great deal of comedy—comic repartee and insult. An astonishing array of relics appear as well: St. Jerome’s mandible, a leaf from the burning bush, many thorns from Jesus’ crown at the court of Pilate, the mummified camels of three wise men, a boat once belonging to St. Peter and St. Afra’s patella. Relics come in many forms: blood, breast milk, bone, skin, hair, teeth, a foot, arrows, thorns and chains. The fascination with these concrete traces of holy men and women is at once reaffirming of the incarnate reality of church and human longing to be close to the divine. Dismas describes the effect of Frederick the Elector’s collection of relics of Christ’s passion thus: “It was difficult to stand in Gallery Eight without becoming overcome with emotion. Few among those who came to venerate here remained standing or dry-eyed” (44).

On another level, the novel is a wonderful satire of our current politics, economic system, our greed for things once possessed by celebrity and the way in which we value art. “Pricing indulgences was, to be sure, a technical business. But, in its way, it was equitable. Everyone had to pay to have his sins remitted, even kings and queens” (32). Dismas tries to retain a professional integrity in the midst of this rather ethereal and volatile field of assessing the authenticity of relics and their subsequent value. Dismas cultivated expertise in his field and enriched the reliquaries of his patrons. He is shrewd and discerning, but he loses that by which he elevated himself above the greed and pettiness of his clients and his rival relic dealers when he knowingly sells an elaborate counterfeit piece. His integrity is destroyed, and a new humility and authenticity arise in him where his expertise and discerning taste once had been. As the good thief works toward his redemption, he navigates a world of warring elites, ecclesial greed and brutal violence.

Buckley’s novel reminds me of a wonderful short story entitled “Relic” by Robert Olen Butler. It is John Lennon’s shoe—the shoe he purportedly wore when he was killed—that is the priceless relic in this story. A Vietnamese refugee, a Catholic who lost his family but found wealth in business in the United States, finds great solace in possessing this shoe. He wants to buy the other shoe so he can wear the pair and feel a special intimacy with Lennon as well as the pride of possessing an object so valued by western society. Just like the Catholic world of the early 16th century, we tend to invest things with meaning and value, especially things that were once possessed by the famous or the heroic. We invest them with the power to transform us from insignificance to dignity, from meaninglessness to a life of meaning.

I recommend that you pick up Buckley’s novel. It is neither overly spiritual nor theological. Relic Master entertains. It makes the reader laugh while also sparking consideration of themes such as greed and authenticity.

When you read the novel please consider the following questions:

  1. How are relics incorporated into Catholic worship and spirituality today—if at all?
  2. What elements of present-day American culture and faith might Christopher Buckley be satirizing in this novel of the early 16th century?

Some further notes. You can find The New York Times review of The Relic Master here.

Here are two other recent novels that I considered for January:

  • Submission is a novel by the French author Michel Houellebecq. It imagines the secular world of French academia suddenly saturated with quite devout Muslim scholars. The protagonist is a middle-aged literature professor who wrote his dissertation on the Catholic (convert) novelist J.K. Huysmans. It is a timely novel that considers the power of fundamentalism in the context of indifferent secularism. You can find The New York Times review of Submission here.
  • John Irving’s Avenue of Mysteries is a wonderful, though somewhat scandalous read. It is filled with Marian apparitions, portraits of religious zeal, fervent religious petition, questions of memory, and human suffering. The main character, Juan Diego, indicates the novel’s deep religious themes right off the bat. Juan Diego was the indigenous Mexican peasant to whom the Virgin of Guadalupe appeared. The novel also betrays Irving’s knowledge of things Jesuit as well. I intend to interview Irving about the book in the coming weeks. Here is The New York Times review of Avenue of Mysteries. The book is better than Dwight Garner’s review indicates. Give it a shot.

Lastly, in the next few weeks, I will look at two books: Helen Castor’s Joan of Arc: A History and a book of short stories, Tales of Accidental Genius, by Simon van Booy. Castor’s book was reviewed by the Times in July of last year. Booy recently spoke about his writing with Diane Rehm. Both works look quite interesting.

After a few months of hiatus, the Catholic Book Club is, as you can see, committing itself to examine recent works of literature, history and theology that might deepen our faith and our knowledge of it. We will be reading books published within the last 12 months that are reviewed by The New York Times, the New Yorker, the New York Review of Books or other publications. I look forward to this reinvigorated project.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
8 years 10 months ago
Comparing a secular momento to a Relic (Church defined) is asinine in my opinion because it plays to those who would desire to make light of Church practices. This is certainly not the day and age to pander to common misconceptions/perceptions that remain out there and that a certain Associate Editor of this Magazine, is his regular fare. Undoubtably dining out often on the carcass of popular misconception, oblivious to the fact that even among Catholics catechesis is low, and the only people finding these things "funny" are the few that have been better Catechised. In my opinion. Who knows the actual damage being done after rounds and rounds of "telephone" among those without any practical catechsis? Such is for the Jesuit Fathers to discern, not me. Bottom line, the reason why any First Class Church Relic is venerated in the Church is the undoubted presence/association with the third person of the Trinity. In my opinion, we need more fact than "hep" to accomplish the work. in Christ. The Memorial of St Agnes, Virgin and Martyr
James Addison
8 years 9 months ago
Could you please clarify or cite the source of your definition of a first class relic? My understanding is that first class relics include any physical bodily remains of a saint or blessed. Is this what you mean by the undoubted presence/association of the Third Person? Thank you.
Janean Stallman
8 years 9 months ago
After reading "The Relic Master," I came to the conclusion that Kevin's review is better than the book. Yes, the novel was entertaining, and kept my interest until I finished it.The characters were well drawn, and there was the chase and the quest for redemption, which was almost realized by the near death of Dismas, I actually looked for him to be carried up to paradise in the end. But,the reader should prepare herself for some vulgar language and lots of talk of torture and gruesome disease. The novel points to the greed and immoral activities of some historical church leaders. To read this novel as a metaphor for what has happened in the Church recently, is to open again the painful discussion of the sexual abuse by priests, as well as the high life style of some bishops and other leaders. I don't think we want to go there. As for relics, it's rare to see them in American churches, at least in the places I have lived and worshiped. There may have been something in a church I attended in Illinois, but nothing was ever made of it or said about it, so I can't speak to the holiness of it. But, if I were to go to Rome, or other places in Europe where relics are more on view, I think I would be in awe with the age and possibility of authenticity. It's important to remember that relics are just material things, however old they may be or close to the body of Christ that they may be. But, if by venerating such an object, a person feels the presence of the Divine, then it has served it's purpose. Kevin has reviewed many other books that I have enjoyed more, but it was refreshing to read a novel. Thanks.

The latest from america

Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024