Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Barbara GreenNovember 06, 2007
Roman Catholics can be spotted with eyes raised to heaven, overheard to give thanks that we are not like certain others, fundamentalists and such. When I was once engaging in that self-congratulatory behavior I was helpfully challenged by John R. Donahue, S.J. (familiar to readers of America) who said perhaps Catholics aren’t literalists about Scripture but we are surely fundamentalists about much other religious language. If pressed or stressed, we will likely go fundamentalist about the Bible too.

Today’s first reading from Maccabees may be such an occasion. Biblical language, including the words of Jesus in the Gospels, can usefully be placed along a spectrum running from nearly literal to deeply symbolic. It also matters who is reading and under what circumstances, and for that I thank Dean Brackley, S.J. (also occasionally appearing on the pages of this publication). When I was exploring with him ways to mitigate the language of violence in the psalms preparatory to a workshop I was giving, he constrained me not to quickly take away from the poor language that allows them to speak the truth of their unjust and painful situation.

So five questions to ponder for the first reading: 1) When is it set? How crucial is it that the scene pictured is at the actual moment of ultimate accountability: die or compromise a principle? 2) Is willingness to die for a noble cause--and in hopes of life after death--different for Christians than for Muslims? We can find differences in the circumstances between martyrs and suicide bombers, but still, the question arises. 3) What dangers tend to cluster when we feel absolute certitude we are right? What is the untold story here about those not able to rise to the courage that these brothers show? How would they be judged? 4) For whom might this be a dangerous reading? Perhaps for those in the majority and in positions of power, likely to urge this act on others or to exact it of opponents. 5) For whom is it more clearly salutary? Those loving, compassionate, deeply self-knowledgeable, aware of God’s grace.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
17 years 7 months ago
Excellent questions for thought! Thank you very much.

The latest from america

Pope Leo XIV has appointed the French archbishop of Chambéry, Thibault Verny, as the new president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. He succeeds Cardinal Seán O’Malley, 81, the emeritus archbishop of Boston.
Gerard O’ConnellJuly 05, 2025
U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks with other members of the House July 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington after final passage of U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping spending and tax bill. (OSV News photo/Jonathan Ernst, Reuters)
“Deep cuts” to SNAP and Medicaid will “inflict real suffering on these families…. SNAP and Medicaid are not luxuries, they are lifelines for millions of children across our country.”
Kevin ClarkeJuly 03, 2025
It was one of the first times Leo has spoken unscripted at length in public, responding to questions posed to him by the children.
The Vatican has named the judges that will preside over the trial of disgraced Father Marko Rupnik.