Have you heard about "vicarious religion?" The phrase made me laugh out loud when I spotted it in Peter Steinfels’ terrific review of "A Secular Age" by Charles Taylor (subscriber only). Apparently this is a description of the "penumbra" of belief remaining in those for whom religion is but "an ancestral memory," a resource for rites of passage, or a consolation in collective disasters. (Like those instant street shrines after 9/11?) But I’m more interested in the church goers left on the ground, who persist in taking their faith full strength and straight up? In my family of good "vicarious" religious folk, formerly called "lapsed" or "communal Catholics," I can now understand my role. Obviously, I am the "designated believer." My weekly mass going is not a replay of Mother Macree, me old Irish grandma, but something more acerbic, and intellectually assertive, if this makes any sense. If and when I receive any friendly fire, I’ll ardently argue my case in good thorn in your side fashion. Here I stand people, with all these diamonds and delights, but you all keep refusing the gift. Well, maybe others have some better strategies for carrying on in a secular age. Any thoughts? Sidney Callahan
Vicarious religion and the designated believer
Show Comments ()
1
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
16 years 6 months ago
I think we need to look at history as a guide. Before 313 AD Christianity was a small group of devoted believers. After 313 AD we become the official religion in a world where religion was decided for you by the government. That world is gone and religion is a matter of choice since the Enlightenment. That reality presents a challenge to us in living our faith with love and fidelity to the Gospel message. We can help each other do this in our communities.
The latest from america
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?