Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Tim ReidyJuly 25, 2011

Like many of our readers, I suspect, I turn immediately to the letters page when I open up a magazine or newspaper. Two recent letters on two different articles stood out this week, and I think they're worth highlighting here.

The first is in response to Bill Keller's review of Absolute Monarchs: A History of the Papacy in the New York Times Book Review. (Read our own Fr. Ray Schroth's response here.) The second graph is particularly astute, and serves as a cautionary note to journalists in both the secular and Catholic media:

To the Editor:

It’s probably true that in 2,000 years a great many of the 265 popes have been as bad as John Julius Norwich claims — unlike our 44 presidents, who have been outstanding leaders in every way. But I question the ability of an “agnostic Protestant” and a fallen-away Catholic to disengage themselves from any animus toward the institutional church.

While a point-by-point refutation of the book and the review is beyond my ability, one bit sticks in my craw: Keller quotes Norwich’s conclusion that progressive Catholics (and I count myself one) have been disappointed by the failure of recent pontiffs to make progress “on the leading issues of the day — on homosexuality, on contraception, on the ordination of women priests.” To my mind, the “leading issues of the day” are war, hunger and the exploitation of the poor and the defenseless. The Vatican has spoken forcefully on each of these issues and many more that degrade our fellow men and women.

JOSEPH D. POLICANO
East Hampton, N.Y.

The second letter is one of many the New Yorker published in response to Aleksandar Hemon's devastating account of his infant daughter's death. After reading Hemon's essay I was shellshocked, unsure how to respond to his caustic refutation of any attempt to find "meaning" in such a horrible reality. Ken Klonsky succeeds where I could not:

I have never read anything as harrowing as Aleksandar Hemon’s account of his baby’s death (“The Aquarium,” June 13th & 20th). It is often said that losing a child is the most painful thing a person can endure, and the despair Hemon expresses is usually unspeakable. With greatest respect for the writer, I must disagree with his conclusion that “Isabel’s suffering and death did nothing for her, or us, or the world.” What it did for me was to affirm the power of one small human life.

Ken Klonsky
Vancouver, B.C.

Tim Reidy

 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Vince Killoran
13 years 4 months ago
"The Vatican has spoken forcefully on each of these issues and many more that degrade our fellow men and women."

Some, but not with the resources and fervor as with issues of reproduction rights and sexual identity.

I'd love it if the Vatican re-called their ambassador over acts of war or poverty as they did in Ireland in the past day.
CONNIE CHARETTE
13 years 4 months ago
David, as usual, not sure how to respond, but I do take exception to your characterization of Hemon's essay as maudlin. It's an emotional subject, of course, but full of real pathos. I wonder if you've read it.

The latest from america

A touring relic will give the faithful in Washington and seven states a rare opportunity to venerate St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the greatest Christian theologians.
Kurt Jensen – OSV NewsNovember 22, 2024
Brian Strassburger, S.J., a Jesuit priest serving migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, joins “Jesuitical” this week to talk about what the election of Donald J. Trump might mean for his ministry.
JesuiticalNovember 22, 2024
“Laudato Si’” and its implementation seem to have stalled in the church. We need to revivify our efforts—and to recognize the Christological perspectives of our care for creation and our common home.
Louis J. CameliNovember 22, 2024
Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024