Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsDecember 24, 2012

Christmas celebrates God’s overwhelming longing to be united with us. So much did God desire this that he became one of us, “pitching his tent among us,” as the Gospel of John puts it (1:14). Yet unity seems a far-off goal not only in our country, but in our church.

Some could even argue that disunity is what God wants. “Do you think I have come to bring peace on earth?” asked Jesus. “No, I tell you, but division” (Lk 12:51). That provocative line seems to indicate that Jesus’ message was not one of uniting but dividing. It could be used as an excuse for manifold divisions evident today. Jesus intended divisions, so is it worth working for unity?

If our answer to that last question is no, then we have misunderstood Christ’s heartfelt desire for unity, which is expressed several times in the New Testament. In a fine new book, Jesus of Nazareth: What He Wanted, Who He Was, the German Scripture scholar Gerhard Lohfink unpacks that complicated utterance. “Jesus has come to unite the people under God’s rule, and he has indeed brought many people together in this new condition,” writes Father Lohfink. “He has bridged chasms. He has assembled tax collectors and Zealots, sinners and saints, poor and rich at one table. His colorfully mixed band of disciples is a sign of this gathering movement.” The inevitable division, the author points out, comes only from opposition to Jesus’ message, an opposition that may even break families apart. The time for decision, says Jesus, is now; and he expects division only inasmuch as some will fail to make the decision to join him in his mission. But in the end, it is unity with the Father and with one another that Jesus desires.

Heady stuff for Christmas time. But the theme of unity runs like a bright thread through the Advent and Christmas readings. John the Baptist sets aside his personal goals to unite himself with the one whose coming he has foretold. “He must increase and I must decrease” (Jn 3:30) is not only an express ion of the Baptist’s humility, but a call for his followers to join together and follow the Messiah.

At the annunciation, God unites in the most intimate way possible with humanity, divinizing our nature and humanizing his divinity. In the wake of the annunciation, Joseph, facing his initial doubts and what must have been fierce social pressure, cleaves to Mary, with whom he has been united by their betrothal. God does not desire Mary and Joseph to separate, but to cling together as one.

The infant Jesus himself is a physical sign of the union of human and the divine. At his birth, revelation is united with the revealer; the Word is united with the flesh; and a divine desire—the indwelling of God—is united with a most earthly occurrence—a woman giving birth.

During his years of public ministry, Jesus will gather people together. His work with the disciples is as a group. We are so familiar with the call of the first disciples that we forget that Jesus could just as easily have called only one person, say Peter, to help him with his ministry. But he does not. Jesus calls a group, for a variety of reasons.

First, he might have understood the unique talents that each person brought to the table. The tax collector Matthew brought a different set of gifts than the fisherman Peter or Mary, the woman of Magdala. Then, as now, the church needs everyone’s skills, man and woman alike. Second, Jesus most likely grasped the need for human beings to be with one another; faith is not a solitary proposition. Third, Jesus may have recognized that he himself needed people; he craved friendship. And in what would have been an obvious sign, he selects 12 apostles. “What Jesus says now is that he is gathering Israel,” writes Father Lohfink, “he is claiming to do precisely what God will do at the end of time: gather, sanctify and unite Israel.”

The one whose birth is celebrated at Christmas makes specific pleas for unity during his lifetime, seeking to “gather together” people as, in one of the Bible’s tenderest images, “a hen gathers her chicks” (Mt 23:37). “That they all may be one,” Jesus says in John’s Gospel (17:21), expressing the wishes of his Father, with whom he is united as one.

God the Father desires all to be drawn to him. The Prince of Peace desires an end to discord and violence. And the Spirit desires unity so ardently that at Pentecost he enlivens the disciples with the gift of tongues so that the Gospel will be heard not simply by one group of people but by all.

At the first Christmas, God became radically one with humanity. God continues to inflame the human heart with a deep desire for unity. Who does not wish for this? In our desires we hear echoes of God’s longing for the world. The Christmas spirit, then, is more than the giving of gifts or being kind. It is a desire to do the hard work of reconciliation, a willingness to strive for concord, a readiness to cease partisanship and a fervent hope for union with one another, in the name of the one who united his life with our own. 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
11 years 11 months ago

Over and over I've pondered what this unity might look like.  God and humanity are united hypostatically (what a big word!) in the person of the Word made flesh.  We are all then united in the long chain of humanity to God in a unique way through the Incarnation.  Ours in not merely an association with God but  some deeper mystery.  But what amazes me as well is not our unity with God but how God plans to make us humans <em><strong>one body. </strong></em>Are we on our way into that noosphere which Teilhard de Chardin described.  Will be all be participants in one consciousness, one mind, at the end of our evolutionary journey.  And, is this outcome to be not merely a human end goal but a divinely driven, grace driven outcome.  As a believer I can only leave the final stage in the hands of God.  But, too, as a believer I can thrill at every breakthrough in the present life when people come together as one.

Luis Gutierrez
11 years 11 months ago
At the first Christmas, God became radically one with humanity, right? Or, did God became radically one with human males only? It seems to me, that the current obsession with perpetuating the male-only priesthood betrays a visceral patriarchal assumption that, somehow, the radical unity between God and humanity applies only to men, and not to women. Isn't it time to challenge this patriarchal assumption, for the glory of God and the good of souls?
John Wren
11 years 11 months ago
"We desire to do the hard work of reconciliation, a willingness to strive for concord, a readiness to cease partisanship and a fervent hope for union with one another, in the name of the one who united his life with our own." If just one of us in each neighborhood takes this to heart and reaches out to our neighbors, all of our neighbors, the world will change. I'm going to suggest this as the motto for our Jesuit Guide Online Faith Sharing Group. Want to join us? See http://www.Facebook.com/groups/Jesuit-Guide-Group
Michael Barberi
11 years 11 months ago
I agree that the road to unity is for each of us to take this to heart as John Wren suggested. However, it would be misguided to judge the profound disagreement within the Catholic Church over certain teachings as a discontinuity or disunity. I say this because I believe that God leads us to the truth in both agreement and sometimes in respectful disagreement. If clergy, theologians and the laity always accepted, without respectful and legitimate criticism, every teaching claimed to be the truth, who among us would want slavery, usury, the torture of heretics, et al, to be with us today? This does not take away from the message that we are called to be united in Christ or that His Church should speak in one voice. Vatican II called for collegiality and to a large degree this has not happened. Perhaps the hierarchy of power and authority in a learning and teaching Church should be: the pope, the council of bishops in a decision-making role with the pope, then the Roman Curia, theologians and the laity in a purely consultative role. At present we have: the pope, the Roman Curia in a quasi-decision-making role with the pope, then the council of bishops in a purely consultative role (and not very frequently enough) while theologians and the laity often do not have any voice.

The latest from america

Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024