Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Kevin ClarkeMarch 11, 2013

Kristen Day, the executive director of Democrats for Life of America, offers some unsolicited advice in the Daily News to N.Y. Governor Andrew Cuomo as he seeks to extend some of the most permissive abortion laws in the nation:

In his second State of the State address, in 2012, Gov. Cuomo said that one of the most important things he had learned in his first year as governor is that every interest group has a lobbyist. But it wasn’t until last Wednesday that he heard from the lobbyists for preemies.

That’s when a group of New York physicians went to Albany to tell the governor, who is weighing legislation that would expand abortion rights, that preemies are often viable after just 24 weeks of pregnancy. Therefore, they said, at 24 weeks, if a mother’s health is at risk, doctors can and should deliver her baby instead of aborting it.

For abortion rights activists, the doctors’ message is an inconvenient truth, badly timed. New York already has nearly double the national per capita abortion rate, not to mention the highest teen abortion rate in the nation. Not coincidentally, New York also has fewer abortion restrictions than most every other state.

But that’s not permissive enough for abortion rights activists. They want to change the fact that, under current state law, abortion after 24 weeks is only allowed for women whose lives are in danger. Cuomo has proposed legislative changes that are expected to officially green-light abortions past 24 weeks — potentially through a woman’s due date — if her physical, emotional or psychological health are threatened.

Read the rest here.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Marie Rehbein
11 years 10 months ago
Most women who have abortions after 24 weeks are having them because they have learned that their fetus has some defect that would prevent its survival either for the duration of the pregnancy or after birth. In a very indirect way, the health of the mother is affected by this, but not enough to likely be justification by itself for an abortion. Many women who terminate these pregnancies do so in order to try again sooner. The few women who might terminate a healthy baby are not part of the abortion rights viewpoint, and most would argue that no physician is likely to participate in such an abortion. As we know, though, there have been a few abortion providers who do not recognize a healthy fetus as reason to refuse to do an abortion. So, in the big picture, the typical woman and the typical doctor are given prominence, and the exceptional case of the amoral woman and doctor is ignored.

The latest from america

If U.S. Catholics seek to embrace Martin Luther King Jr.'s desire to "redeem the soul of America," we will also have to reclaim the soul of Catholicism, which is nothing less than a broad and inclusive love for all, including those considered “stranger.”
Bryan N. MassingaleJanuary 19, 2025
“The reports being circulated of planned mass deportations targeting the Chicago area are not only profoundly disturbing but also wound us deeply,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said Sunday during a visit to Mexico City
Pope Francis expressed the hope that the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that came into effect on Sunday, Jan. 19, “would be respected immediately by all the parties [involved]” and would lead to “the release of all the hostages” and the rapid provision of urgently needed humanitarian aid to the
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 19, 2025
Vice President-elect JD Vance’s wife, Usha, a practicing Hindu, once told him that she believed his 2019 conversion to Catholicism “was good for you.”