Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Chicago Archbishop Blase J. Cupich visits with Kareem and Rana Irfan before the19th annual Catholic-Muslim "iftar" dinner at the Zakat Foundation of America in Bridgeview, Ill (CNS photo/Karen Callaway/Catholic New World).

Archbishop Blase Cupich’s star burned a bit brighter Thursday morning with news that Pope Francis tapped the Chicago prelate for a post on the powerful Congregation for Bishops, where the 67 year old will help shape the global episcopate and lend a hand in appointing at least two dozen U.S. bishops in coming years.

The news is decidedly “inside baseball,” but it could nonetheless have a profound impact on the types of men chosen to lead the church in the United States and, as a result, shape how the institution interacts in the public square.

The effect of Cupich’s appointment could have big implications for the U.S. hierarchy, where some members have been willing to engage in so-called “culture war” issues, rhetorical combat in the public square that Pope Francis has discouraged.

Cupich, handpicked by Pope Francis to lead the Archdiocese of Chicago in 2014, is by contrast one of a handful of bishops promoted by the pope in recent years who have voiced sympathy for his agenda. Other names that are often included in this group are San Diego’s Bishop Robert McElroy and Santa Fe’s Archbishop John Wester.

At the bishops’ national gathering in November, for example, Cupich took to the floor to express disappointment that immigration reform was not included in the bishops’ five core priorities, while McElroy lamented that the bishops’ voting guide seemed to him to downplay the importance of caring for the environment and combatting poverty.

Of course, the ability of Cupich to influence the American hierarchy is limited to the vacancies that arise during his time on the committee. At least a couple of major sees, including Washington and Boston, are expected to open in coming years, but the leaders of other major archdioceses, such as New York, Philadelphia and Los Angeles, are relatively young.

Appointments to smaller dioceses, however, for which the pope relies on local advice, could remake the face of the U.S. hierarchy.

A handful of U.S. bishops have already reached 75, when they are required to submit letters of resignation, and are awaiting their replacements, including Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Center; Bishop J. Terry Steib of Memphis; and Bishop Paul Loverde of Arlington, Va. At least a dozen more are close to aging out, and among them are bishops who are already classified as “Francis bishops,” including Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson, Bishop Richard Pates of Des Moines and Bishop Stephen Blaire of Stockton, Calif.

Still, these kinds of appointments could perhaps shift priorities at the national level—and they serve as something of a farm system for major archdioceses. (Cupich, for example, was bishop of the relatively small diocese Spokane, Wash., before he was sent to Chicago.)

Critics have argued in recent years that the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has been slow in adopting priorities important to Pope Francis by continuing to focus on fights against same-sex marriage and contentious religious liberty issues. John Gehring, whose book The Francis Effect examines the pope’s impact on the U.S. church, told America he sees Cupich’s appointment as a “home run” that could “reshape the landscape of the American hierarchy in the years ahead.”

“It’s a real signal that the pope wants a U.S. church that is more pastoral and inclusive,” he continued. “My hope is this will lead to more 'Francis bishops' who reject the culture wars and want to build a culture of encounter.”

Other Catholics took to social media to express disappointment with the announcement, but a theology professor at the Catholic University of America urged caution, both in celebrating or lamenting the appointment too zealously.

"I think predictions about every appointment to the Congregation for Bishops are mostly over-politicized and often don't materialize in the way that people expect,” Chad Pecknold told America.

He said it’s important for a wide range of viewpoints to be represented on the congregation in order to serve a diverse church.

“Seeing every appointment as special pleading for different factions distracts us from the way the congregation seeks to work for the common good of the whole church,” he said.

The appointment of Cupich to the Congregation for Bishops comes almost three years after another moderate was placed on the committee, Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C. He replaced another American on the committee at the time, Cardinal Raymond Burke, who has been critical of the Francis papacy.

Just under two years into his role as leader of the nation’s third largest archdiocese, Cupich has wasted little time in wading into some of the church’s most vexing challenges at home and abroad. He was selected by the pope to attend the second part of the synod of bishops’ meeting about family issues last fall, where he supported proposals to relax rules that bar certain individuals from Communion, a position that put him at odds with other members of the U.S. delegation.

He has spoken out frequently about other issues important to the pope, including workers’ rights, the environment and gun violence, which is epidemic in Chicago. But facing declining revenue and parish participation in his archdiocese, the archbishop announced earlier this year that the church in Chicago would undertake a years-long review process that could end with the closure of up to a third of the archdiocese’s parishes.

Cupich will be in Krakow for World Youth Day at the end of July, where Pope Francis will address millions of pilgrims in St. Pope John Paul II’s hometown. The pair met for the first time last June at the Vatican.

Note: This story has been updated to correct an error. An earlier draft stated: "He replaced the only other American on the committee at the time, Cardinal Raymond Burke," but other American bishops were also serving on the Congregation for Bishops at that time.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Robert Martino
8 years 5 months ago
Blase Cupich is a cohort of his appointer—Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis) both of which share the same intent—to undue 2000 years of Christianity just as those of the Protestant Revolt tried to do 500 years ago (of which Fr. Bergoglio shall commemorate in October; no doubt Blase Cupich will be in celebrating too). Robert Martino Sr.
Reyanna Rice
8 years 5 months ago
A bit like Chicken Little?? "The sky is falling, the sky is falling!". I find in those moments that taking a deep centering breath and trusting that the Holy Spirit really is in charge works and things turn out just fine.
L J
8 years 5 months ago
that requires Faith and their actions tell us they have none. Pride is the father of all sins....not lust
Crystal Watson
8 years 5 months ago
He's not a liberal/progressive, he's the Pope's man, negative about marriage equality and equality for women in the church, just as the pope is. But considering how conservative those before him have been, like Burke, I guess he's seen as an improvement.
Joshua DeCuir
8 years 5 months ago
Perhaps the author could confirm, but wasn't Crdl. wuerl appointed by Pope Benedict while Rigali was a member of the Congregation? Amazing what a retrograde appointment that was. I never realized how much Catholic liberals' grumblings about bishops appointments reflect political liberals' grumbling about how "conservative" the Supreme Court is. Much sturm und drang signifying....not much.
Lisa Weber
8 years 5 months ago
I hope that some of the bishops appointed will actually be willing to talk to the women in the church. I have yet to see much willingness to have a dialogue. It's funny - seminarians I have talked to say that they hear a lot about the role of women in the church. Why aren't women being included in this discussion?
Crystal Watson
8 years 5 months ago
I think that's because there is no place for the discussion to go. The pope has made it clear that he will not allow women to be deacons or priests or cardinals. And there are no other 'roles' for women in the church that will make any real difference. What I don't understand is why all the priests and bishops, many of whom consider themselves progressives, don't have the integrity to tell the pope he is wrong on this. Is job security really more important than anything else?
Darrin French
8 years 5 months ago
I pray for Divine Intervention! The Faithful deserve a solid leader who protects the sacred deposit of the faith, which is immutable. I recall a prophecy in that, “Bishops would oppose Bishops, priests oppose other priests, and Cardinals oppose Cardinals”. Pope Francis is in need of much prayer for our country is already doomed and this appointment is the catalyst to amplify damage and slander already at epic levels. ONLY God can save the church and our country. Our Lady is sand bagging; it will not be long that we see our sins the way God sees them. – a mini prejudgment is upon us but first the Church will suffer much before it gets better.

The latest from america

With the opening of the Holy Year 2025, Pope Francis’ schedule of liturgies in December and January has expanded.
Catholic News ServiceDecember 20, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump on Dec. 20 announced his intention to appoint Brian Burch, currently the president of CatholicVote, as the next U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See.
Kate Scanlon - OSV NewsDecember 20, 2024
Despite his removal, Bishop Joseph E. Strickland has remained an outspoken detractor of Pope Francis, both online and at various events organized by Catholic laity opposed to the Holy Father.
Gina Christian - OSV NewsDecember 20, 2024
On “Jesuitical” this week, Zac and Ashley chat with Colleen Dulle, co-host of the “Inside the Vatican” podcast, about how realistically the new film “Conclave” portrays the process of selecting a new pope. 
JesuiticalDecember 20, 2024