Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 25, 2019
Opposition leader Juan Guaido is surrounded by supporters as he arrives to speak in a public plaza in Caracas, Venezuela, Friday, Jan. 25, 2019. (AP Photo/Fernando Llano)

Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley believes that Venezuela’s interim president, Juan Guaido, “has come up with a formula that could avoid a civil war, could avoid bloodshed” in the country, and he regrets that the country’s military have “not yet” sided with him.

He stated this in an interview in Panama this morning with America and two other news outlets: El Pais (Spain) and Corriere della Sera (Italy).

Asked by America what he made of the dramatic situation that has unfolded in Venezuela as Pope Francis arrived in Panama on Jan. 23 for World Youth Day, the cardinal replied: “I was disappointed this morning to read that the military is not yet on board with the new interim president.” This was a reference to the fact that the head of the military said last evening that his forces support President Nicolas Maduro and not Juan Guaido.

Cardinal O’Malley asked, “If this fails, what is the way forward for Venezuela?”

“Venezuela has been married to corruption and incompetence and the people are suffering so much that it has to be changed,” the cardinal said. “Guaido has come up with a formula that could avoid a civil war, could avoid violence if he could only get more people to support him from the government and from the military. So we’re praying very hard. I worry about his safety.”

Cardinal O’Malley asked, “If this fails, what is the way forward for Venezuela?” He said that “three million people have left [this land]” already, “and people are starving in a country that has more oil than any other country in the world.”

The cardinal said he feels “very close to Venezuela” because “when I was bishop in the Virgin Islands they asked me if I would be bishop in Venezuela...which is a mission of the Capuchins, and I said yes, but afterwards they sent me to Fall River instead.” But, he said, “then I thought I would have been there during Chavez, a gringo bishop would have been an interesting experience.”

“Venezuela is a great country, but people are suffering so much and hopefully this [move by Guaido] can bring [the country] a step forward,” said Cardinal O'Malley.

He repeated, “Venezuela is a great country, but people are suffering so much and hopefully this [move by Guaido] can bring [the country] a step forward.”

When it was put to the cardinal that the Vatican has said little on the situation that has developed so dangerously in these days, except for a brief statement yesterday, Cardinal O’Malley admitted, “certainly, the Vatican has been very cautious.”

The cardinal, who speaks Spanish fluently and is well known in Latin America, explained the rationale for this caution and insisted that the Vatican and the country’s bishops are on the same page: They want the situation to be resolved peacefully, through dialogue.

Cardinal O’Malley affirmed that “they [meaning the Vatican] want to do what the Venezuelan bishops want them to do.” He noted that “they have the advantage of Cardinal Pietro Parolin [the Vatican secretary of state] who was nuncio in Venezuela, and he knows the bishops, he knows the situation there.” He noted that “the one intervention that the Vatican made was not very successful,” referring to its effort to broker a negotiation when it sent a senior diplomat, Archbishop Claudio Maria Celli, to the country more than a year ago.

Cardinal O’Malley emphasized that “the Vatican wants to support whatever the bishops in Venezuela, who are on the ground there, want.” In other words, the Vatican is standing behind them. He recalled in addition to Cardinal Parolin’s experience in Venezuela, Archbishop Peña Parra, the substitute (the third ranking official in the Vatican, often referred to as the chief of staff), is from the country and said “so you have the two top men [after the Latin American pope] who know the situation very well.”

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
JR Cosgrove
5 years 10 months ago

From what I understand the military in Venezuela are under control of Cuba and Hezbollah and Cuba and Teheran are calling the shots. Also Maduro is probably not the most powerful person in Venezuela. That may be Tareck El Aissami who has worked with Iran for years and is Vice President and controls the Intelligence service.

The wonders of socialism!!!

The latest from america

Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024