Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Oregon Gov. Kate Brown delivers her inaugural speech to Oregon legislators in the Capitol House chambers in Salem, Ore., in January. (AP Photo/Don Ryan, File)Oregon Gov. Kate Brown delivers her inaugural speech to Oregon legislators in the Capitol House chambers in Salem, Ore., in January. (AP Photo/Don Ryan, File)  

PORTLAND, Ore. (CNS) -- Calling state lawmakers "intolerant of widely held opposing views" and religious beliefs, the Oregon Catholic Conference is denouncing a Legislature-approved bill that requires health insurers to cover abortion on demand.

Gov. Kate Brown is expected to sign House Bill 3391, which was passed 33-23 in the Oregon House and 17-13 in the Senate as a way to counteract expected changes in federal health care policy.

The bill increases state spending by $10.2 million to provide free coverage of exams, drugs, devices and procedures, including abortion.

The state's Catholic bishops urged a veto, saying the bill "forces all Oregon taxpayers to help finance an extremist abortion agenda that does not enjoy majority support."

Passed by the Senate on the day after Independence Day, the legislation "has more to do with force than it does with freedom," the conference said in a July 10 statement.

"By insisting on complete insurance coverage of abortion, including late-term and sex-selective abortions, the legislature shows itself intolerant of widely held opposing views and will compel thousands of Oregonians to support what their conscience rejects," the conference said, urging citizens to sign petitions to put a measure blocking taxpayer funding of abortion on the 2018 Oregon ballot.

The bill did not get through the Legislature easily. After emotional debate and the vote, Senate Republicans issued a statement saying the legislation is "nothing more than a political statement and a political gift card to Planned Parenthood that brought unnecessary drama and divisiveness to the end of the legislative session."

Earlier, Providence Health System had threatened to exit the state's insurance market, saying the religious exemptions did not go far enough. Though the bill's handlers did increase exemptions, GOP lawmakers say the provisions still fall short.

The bill orders the Oregon Health Authority to provide coverage where religious organizations will not.

The House majority leader, Rep. Jennifer Williamson, a Portland Democrat, was a chief supporter of the proposed law, saying high medical bills can prompt bankruptcy or homelessness.

Pro-life lawmakers approved of much of the bill, but questioned why abortion had to be included, causing a moral crisis. They attempted to have abortion provisions removed, but that motion failed.

Oregon already accommodates and provides for abortion more than most states. There are no waiting periods, education requirements or spending limits on taxpayer funds. Oregon's Medicaid program already spends nearly $2 million a year to pay for about 3,500 abortions.

Bill Diss, leader of Precious Children of Portland and a member of Holy Rosary Parish in the city, called the proposed law "fundamentally an abortion bill that will boost the coffers of abortion providers like Planned Parenthood."

Diss said other portions of the bill could be accomplished "without further funding and promoting the killing of unborn children."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

The latest from america

Vice President-elect JD Vance’s wife, Usha, a practicing Hindu, once told him that she believed his 2019 conversion to Catholicism “was good for you.”
To see what Trump 2.0’s America could look like, John W. Miller spoke to people in Punxsutawney, Pa. about how life might change for them in 2025.
John W. MillerJanuary 17, 2025
The story is as fun as it is simple, weaving together spacefaring pirates, planets with hidden treasure and nods to 1980s classics like “The Goonies.”
Eric ClaytonJanuary 17, 2025
Karla Sofía Gascón, right, and Zoe Saldaña in a scene from "Emilia Pérez" (Shanna Besson/Netflix via AP).
‘Emilia Pérez’ is wildly divisive, facing criticism for its portrayal of Mexico and its handling of transgender issues. Our critic enjoyed it.
John DoughertyJanuary 17, 2025