Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Robert P. ImbelliJuly 14, 2015
An opponent of same-sex marriage protests outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington June 18. (CNS photo/Carlos Barria, Reuters)

I found much prudential and sensible pastoral exhortation in America’s editorial on the Supreme Court decision regarding same sex marriage (“After Obergefell,” 7/20). And that, in my view, is both its strength and its weakness.

Appeal is made to Catholics to proceed in the decision’s aftermath with “humility” and “respect,” as they engage in the public conversation. Such virtues are, indeed, indispensable. But so are their sister virtues of “truth-telling” and “parrhesia” (a favorite of Pope Francis), which the editorial largely neglects.

Thus the editorial runs the risk of being read to support the disjunction between the “pastoral” and the “doctrinal” that has bedeviled discussions of the coming Synod. Citing Cardinal Marx does not dispel the concern that this disjunction may, in fact, be operative.

The editorial does acknowledge that “the Gospel makes radical demands on every dimension of human living.” It would have been considerably strengthened had this perspective been elaborated and, in particular, had it been stressed that such demands very much embrace the sexual dimension of human living.

The editors persuasively quote Pope Francis that “the first proclamation” must be: “Jesus Christ has saved you.” The challenge we face as church, however, especially in North America and Europe, is to proclaim this Good News to a culture that too often reduces “salvation” to a therapeutic and individualist “flourishing.” Francis himself understands this. Hence the importance of his discernment of the counterfeits of authentic human flourishing in chapter three of “Laudato Si’,” “The Human Roots of the Ecological Crisis,” and his insistence in chapter four on the imperative for an “Integral Ecology.”

As it stands, the editorial’s well-intentioned pastoral accommodation can slip too easily into cultural capitulation (of the sort one seems currently to be witnessing in a number of Catholic universities).

Rev. Robert P. Imbelli, a priest of the Archdiocese of New York, is emeritus associate professor of theology at Boston College.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Barry Fitzpatrick
9 years 4 months ago
Fr Imbelli cannot resist the blanket condemnation, as he signs off, of "a number of Catholic universities." I am reminded of the wisdom of an old teacher, sarcastically delivered, that he was glad that there were at least some critics upholding the values that they thought I had so long ago abandoned. Fr Imbelli does nothing to expand the pastoral accommodation, rather he minimizes it by rushing to judgment that those of us who seek just such a humble and pastoral approach have "culturally capitulated" once again. Perhaps we have culturally embraced our brothers and sisters in ways heretofore unheard or unimagined, embracing them in the arms of the same loving God who loves us ALL beyond measure.
Alan Mitchell
9 years 4 months ago
Ancient psychagogues like Philodemus of Gadara caution about how parrhesia should be used. There is frank speech and there is frank speech. Tell us, Fr. Imbelli, how you understand the application of parrhesia should be made regarding the topic at hand.
L J
9 years 4 months ago
It is unfortunate that a faculty member from Boston College (is it still Catholic?) would be throwing stones at the notion of "speak the truth in love". My comment "is it still Catholic?" is a form of parrhesia. It is also polemic. Likewise, calling out - casting aspersions - on those who would invite the nation to be more irenic in their interest of being more parrhesia-like (polemic) adds nothing to the Anima Christi. Why is it so important to some to be war-like? What is it about them that they must toss over tables, pull out the whips and scream and shout? What are they telling us about their spirit? Raymond Burke (is he still a Cardinal?) comes to mind. . Americans have no problem being parrhesia-like. Witness this post in response to Imbelli's parrhesia-like reply to the Editors of America. There is no gift at being parrhesia-like. Freedom of speech (parrhesia) must be tempered with love. Bravo America Magazine for suggesting, nay gently nudging, American Catholics to be more like Pope Francis than Savonarola. Can we now put away our weapons? "Turn me over, I'm done on this side!" - St Lawrence, Martyr

The latest from america

Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024