Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsOctober 04, 2016
(iStock photo)

Gone are the days when the main difference between one college dormitory and another was the number of people per room. Today’s college students often are presented with a host of options—from dorms with concierge and housekeeping services to luxury, off-campus apartments. Such accommodations come with a price, however, and the cost of these upscale options often means that the residents of the buildings are far less diverse than the amenities offered to them. When compared with more traditional college housing, the cost of living in residences both on and off campus at many public universities can vary widely. The result has been an increase in both racial and socioeconomic segregation among college students at these universities, even as many students profess their support for diversity.

Establishing a more equitable rent structure for on-campus housing is a good first step toward ensuring more diverse living quarters. But perhaps greater uniformity in the living quarters might also help. While colleges and universities must compete with one another to attract students, the race for the best and newest dorms should not be the main selling point for the college experience. Safe, clean housing is a necessity, but perhaps the resources devoted to luxury upgrades might be better spent on academic and extracurricular programs that, while less noticeable during campus tours, open students’ eyes to a diverse range of viewpoints and provide them with better value for their money in the long run.

More: Education
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Andrew Di Liddo
8 years 2 months ago
Quite a good commentary on dormitory living. My 3 years in a dormitory and fourth year off campus in an apartment with two friends was an incredibly rich experience with a diverse range of viewpoints, interests and endeavors with the people who lived around us. This commentary could be further expanded too specifically to substandard living off campus that many collegiate football players are prone to these days. It used to be that there were dormitories for athletes that were well supervised with adult oversight. Too many athletes go astray today because of unsupervised living off of campus. Also, America Magazine could do a service by shining some light on how university and college athletic programs rarely support themselves and are subsidized by on average a surcharge of $800 per student. With ticket sales, tailgating proceeds, product endorsements and licenses, TV advertising and the whole enchilada that is college football finance needs to be put under some scrutiny. The pendulum has swung too far toward athletics and away from academics on campus.

The latest from america

While I would never wish this disease on anyone, it has prompted a personal eucharistic revival of sorts within my own spiritual life.
Rosie La Puma LebelJanuary 03, 2025
“I want to be a companion to Sister Sheral on this journey for as long as I have breath,” Sister Maureen Sinnott writes.
Sheral Marshall, O.S.F.January 03, 2025
San Antonio's Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller discussed the incoming Trump administration, synodality, the U.S. bishops’ anti-poverty program and his health.
“President Biden's decision to commute the sentences of 37 prisoners condemned to death was a reminder that even the most heinous of our sins does not mar our human dignity.”
Helen Prejean, C.S.J.January 03, 2025