In offering a systematic interpretation of Mark’s Gospel I follow him chapter by chapter with what can be called a ’center-slightly left’ interpretation; this is in accord with many, many Catholic exegetes today. By following what I write, you will see practically what it means to be ’center-slightly left’. Mark wrote the first Gospel, and he wrote it most likely in Rome, around 70 AD. Most everyone agrees that the audience to whom he wrote was one very acquainted with suffering, particularly a suffering for the faith in Jesus. The Gospel, then, is a life of Jesus, the adult, which will help Christians of Rome to hold on to Jesus with courage, conviction and determination. If Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians can be a guide, we can presume that these early Roman Christians, while baptized in the name of Jesus Christ and baptized into him, needed ever deeper understanding of this Jesus. Ever more deeply must they go, if the hope to survive suffering in his name, to plumb the depths of the meaning of Jesus and to understand as well as possible what Jesus taught them about living with God. No doubt at the time of their conversion and baptism they needed teaching both about Jesus and about his lessons, but now in 70 AD Mark felt the circumstances dictated a life of Jesus which would help deepen the Christological and moral aspects of his church. John’s Gospel makes the remark that ’Jesus did many things, but I have chosen these...’ The same is true for Mark. He knew many things about Jesus (it would be most unlikely that he did not know much of what later writers wrote), but he chose what we have before us. What he chose is enough for his purpose, he believes; indeed, his purpose in writing dictated what he would choose, and so every piece of the Gospel should fit into his purpose. Thus, if we are eager to know what a Gospel passage or saying means, we also very much want to understand why Mark would include this story or word in his Gospel. With these ’background’ statements understood, we move to understand what Mark’s Gospel said to his audience and enjoy for our own lives what he emphasized about Jesus to them. John Kilgallen, S.J.
A systematic study of Mark's Gospel- 1
Show Comments ()
2
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
15 years 7 months ago
I don't know very much about Origin of Alexandra. I know more about his friend Evagrius Ponticus. Evagrius Ponticus (345-399 CE) was a Christian monk, really a hermit, who lived in the Egyptian desert. The life of Christian monks (gender inclusive) can include the renunciation of destructive thoughts that can lead to destructive behavior. The traditional thoughts Christian monks work on or try to let go of are: food, sex, things, anger, dejection, acedia, vainglory and pride. The spirituality of the desert hermits and monks of Egypt was transmitted by Evagrius Ponticus and then to the West through John Cassian (360-435 CE). traditionally desert spirituality includes the renunciation of these eight (8) thoughts when they are destructive preoccupations. It is interesting to consider that there is a relationship between Mark and Evagrius.
15 years 8 months ago
You are right. Mark knew many things about the teachings of Jesus. And he did not mention them in his Gospel. However, he taught many things he knew from Jesus in a later life, when he was reincarnated as Origin in Alexadria in the second century. Unfortunately, in the 6th. century, at the fifth ecumenical Council his writings were considered, under the infulence of Theodora, the wife of the emperor. Why? It was because he taught about the pre-existence of the soul, which includes the concept of reincarnation.
The latest from america
“His presence brings prestige to our nation and to the entire Group of 7. It is the first time that a pope will participate in the work of the G7,” Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said.
“Many conflicting, divergent and often contradictory views of the human person have found wide acceptance … they have led to holders of traditional theories being cancelled or even losing their jobs,” the bishops said.
Robots can give you facts. But they can’t give you faith.
“Irena’s Vow” is true story of a Catholic nurse who used her position to shelter a dozen Jews in World War II-era Poland.