J. Bryan Hehir
From October 8, 2001
Image

What was the appropriate response to the attacks of 9/11? Less than a month after the collapse of the World Trade Center, J. Bryan Hehir outlined the pastoral, social and policy responses necessary to meet the challenges of the post-9/11 world. Father Hehir called the policy response the most difficult of the three. "A measured response to transnational terrorism cannot be primarily a military response," Father Hehir wrote. "Deeper issues than the use of force lie beneath terrorist actions."

Read "What Can Be Done? What Should Be Done?"

The Rev. J. Bryan Hehir is Professor of the Practice in Religion and Society at Harvard Divinity School and the Weatherhead Center of International Affairs, Harvard University.

Comments

TM Lutas | 8/29/2011 - 4:21pm
It is unfortunate that you are re-running a response to the horrific attacks of 9/11 that makes basic errors regarding the nature of the struggle instead of the taking the 10 years that we have had to research and reflect and improve on all of our responses and providing something that has benefited from our improved understanding of our enemy.

In those early days, it was not so obvious that these attackers not only were attacking the US but were attacking the very legitimacy of the effort to limit war to state actors. To a certain extent, they have succeeded in legitimizing non-state warfare again. Taking up the problem of non-state warfare, especially when we have a major GOP candidate who is championing it (Dr. Ron Paul's 2001 and 2007 bills on reinvigorating letters of Marque and Reprisal) is something that could not have been realistically covered in 2001 but would have been a timely effort in these days. Well, maybe next year.