Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsSeptember 01, 2016

When Apple refused to help the F.B.I. hack into the iPhone of a shooter in the attack last December in San Bernardino, both sides claimed their actions defended the common good. Apple warned that intentionally breaking their own software would put the safety and privacy of millions of their customers at risk. The government said that not accessing the phone to gather more intelligence would put the public at risk. They also claimed they could be trusted with secret backdoors into software and devices—that is, special access that makes systems, including those of private companies, vulnerable. The tech world was not so optimistic.

In August, a highly sensitive toolkit of exploits—taking advantage of previously unknown vulnerabilities—held by the National Security Agency was leaked. Apple was right.

To be sure, intelligence gathering and data collection are important tools for law enforcement, but they also require strong checks and balances. The leaked N.S.A. exploits have compromised the security of widely used network equipment found in our offices and schools. The privacy and safety of U.S. citizens are no longer just in the hands of the N.S.A.; malicious hackers and foreign governments can join the surveillance party. There are very few binding guidelines for the use and reporting of new vulnerabilities and hacks. When the N.S.A., whose mission includes not only intelligence and surveillance but also information security, discovers new vulnerabilities, it does not have to inform hardware or software makers. Without strong rules for reporting technological vulnerabilities to hardware and software makers, the government is failing to truly protect the common good.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
8 years 2 months ago
Big Brother comes to us through our phones. This is not reassuring.

The latest from america

Delegates hold "Mass deportation now!" signs on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee July 17, 2024. (OSV News photo/Brian Snyder, Reuters)
Around the affluent world, new hostility, resentment and anxiety has been directed at immigrant populations that are emerging as preferred scapegoats for all manner of political and socio-economic shortcomings.
Kevin ClarkeNovember 21, 2024
“Each day is becoming more difficult, but we do not surrender,” Father Igor Boyko, 48, the rector of the Greek Catholic seminary in Lviv, told Gerard O’Connell. “To surrender means we are finished.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2024
Many have questioned how so many Latinos could support a candidate like DonaldTrump, who promised restrictive immigration policies. “And the answer is that, of course, Latinos are complicated people.”
J.D. Long GarcíaNovember 21, 2024
Vice President Kamala Harris delivers her concession speech for the 2024 presidential election on Nov. 6, 2024, on the campus of Howard University in Washington. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)
Catholic voters were a crucial part of Donald J. Trump’s re-election as president. But did misogyny and a resistance to women in power cause Catholic voters to disregard the common good?
Kathleen BonnetteNovember 21, 2024