Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
James Martin, S.J.August 27, 2009

Dan Gilgoff over at US News interviews Adam Clymer, Senator Kennedy's biographer on the man's faith:

Some obituaries today are calling Ted Kennedy a devout Catholic. How important was his faith to him personally?
It meant a great deal to him. A friend of his told me how painful it was for him not to take [Holy Communion] between the time he got divorced and an annulment. He and [second wife] Vicki would often go to noontime mass if things were slow at the Capitol.

I once asked him why someone as well off as him was so interested in the poor and the sick, and he said it was his mother's Catholic teaching: the Sermon on the Mount and the passage from Luke that to those who much is given, much is expected.

So you think his Catholicism shaped his politics?
I wouldn't say it's the only factor, but it's the earliest one. I mean, his mother made sure her children went to church and Sunday school and on summer retreats when they would rather be doing something else.

How long did it take for Kennedy to get his first marriage annulled?
Between the divorce and the annulment, there was about 10 or 11 years. They never really announced when the annulment was granted. We all became aware of it when [Kennedy] took [Holy Communion] from Cardinal [Bernard] Law at his mother's funeral in '95. But the divorce was in 1982.

Read the rest here.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
14 years 10 months ago
The sad and tragic thing is that being divorced is not a reason to avoid Holy Communion, only remarrying without an annullment would require that.  He got some bad counsel from someone, which is tragic for him and for many Catholics.
14 years 10 months ago
So....can an unswerving defender of racial segregation and the inferiority of non-whites be a good Catholic if he or she claims he does other things that are helping the poor?
How does that work, anyway?
14 years 10 months ago
Mark, your example is off.  How to protect the unborn is a prudential matter.  It is certainly not prudent to trumpet the pro-life cause in a way that can never be fulfilled as other than an electoral issue.  Their bluff has been called and most Catholics have returned to the Democratic fold, while the racists you allude to have become largely members of other parties on the right.  As these parties become more overtly racist, especially on matters effecting poverty and immigration, membership involves a serious avoidance of the conscience.

The latest from america

Some polls are going as far to predict that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak might lose his own seat on July 4. He would be the first Conservative prime minister to suffer such a humiliation.
David StewartJuly 01, 2024
“The Eucharist is the food that makes us hungry,” says Eucharistic Revival preacher Joe Laramie, S.J., so when he preaches, he hopes to stir his congregation “to deeper hunger for the Lord, to grow in deeper devotion to him.”
PreachJuly 01, 2024
The Vatican’s first auditor general, Libero Milone, who was forced to resign in June 2017, claims he was framed and says Pope Francis was deceived by Cardinal Angelo Becciu.
Gerard O’ConnellJuly 01, 2024
"Magdalene: I am the utterance of my name" is advocating for setting the record straight on one of Christianity’s most vital disciples.
Michael O’BrienJune 28, 2024