A lead news story in many European dailies today concerns the outrage in Belgium over the early release of the ex-wife of a notorious child killer. Michelle Martin, 51 (pictured here at her trial) was an accomplice to Marc Dutroux, Europe's most notorious serial murderer and paedophile, and arrested with him in 1996.
A 14-year-old girl was found alive two days later cowering in the basement of his Charleroi house along with a severely emaciated 12-year-old. The bodies of two more girls were found buried in the garden of Dutroux's main residence in the southern town of Sars La Buissiere. Less than a month later, two more bodies were found in another property owned by Dutroux.
The couple stood trial in 2004. He was given life imprisonment, she a 30-year jail sentence for kidnapping and imprisoning six girls who were raped by Dutroux. He killed two of the girls; she was found guilty of allowing two others to die of starvation.
Under Belgian law, convicts can appeal for early release after serving a third of their sentence. The justice authorities have finally acceded to her repeated requests to be released on grounds of good behavior, allowing Belgium's most hated woman to serve the remaining 10 years of her probation period in a convent in France.
The convent, naturally, has not been named. She will live under an assumed name. But interestingly, the idea that she be allowed out into the convent came from her. "It is part of her proposal for probation, which has been evaluated over time and was accepted yesterday," Justice Minister Stefaan De Clerck told Reuters yesterday.
The story for the media, naturally, has been the "outpouring of rage" of the parents of the murdered teenagers, and the furious reaction from ordinary people at the release of a "monster" into society.
But the far more interesting story, to me, is that she is to go to a convent. What kind of an extraordinary journey has this woman undergone -- spiritually, psychologically -- that would lead her to want to be in a convent, presumably to dedicate herself to prayer? None of the news reports asks that question.
And what of the convent that has agreed to take her -- if indeed one has? According to AFP, "De Clerck told Belgian radio on Tuesday that Martin hoped to retire to a convent in France if freed, a process which would take time to work out." It's not clear whether that means that a convent is yet to be found. But I would find it surprising if the justice minister would have approved the idea if one hadn't.
It means, therefore, that the members of a French community of nuns has likely visited Martin, and assessed as sincere her desire for the religious life. Even if she does not take vows, she must be earnestly seeking a monastic routine of prayer: ten years is a major commitment both for her and for the community concerned.
Consider the witness implied in this: first, the possibility of redemption open to a sinner of this degree of notoriety; second, the courage of a convent that dares to take into its fold a woman whom the crowds would like to stone to death.
It's also brave given that Belgium, more than any other European country except Ireland, has been in the frying pan over clerical sex abuse of minors; and that it was only a month ago that the Vatican sent the former bishop of Bruges, Roger Vangheluwe, to a French monastery to undergo "spiritual and psychological treatment" after he admitted -- in a lighthearted way that showed no repentance -- abusing two of his nephews (the abuse had taken place too long ago for him to be convicted in the courts). Vangelhuwe subsequently disappeared from the convent, run by the Jerusalem sisters at the community of Magdala, at La Ferte-Imbault in the Loire Valley, after three days. The bishop of the diocese concerned later complained that he had not been consulted -- the move had been arranged by the nunciature in Belgium -- and would have been against it.
I doubt very much the same mistake has been made in this case. One does not casually arrange for the transfer to a convent of a notorious figure without squaring it with the local bishop.
What an amazing film this would make. A woman who had been led into the depths of evil, displaying a total inability to empathize -- she told the court in 2004 that she did not feel "the reflex to save" the girls as they lay starving in the couple's cellar while Dutroux was being held on suspicion of stealing cars -- later turns to God, and spends her life in expiatory prayer, in an enclosed community. Extraordinary.
Having been around prisoners for the last 2 decades, I am humbled by the profound spirituality of those who are "doing time".
What is extraordinary to me is that the justice system of Belgium can recognize and respond to these conversions.
The politics of revenge is so predominant here in the USA that I can barely imagine such a thing happening.
The story of this woman reminds me very much of that of Jens Soering, convicted of a horrendous murder in Virginia in the 1980s. It is different in that Jens proclaims that he is innocent of the crime, but the conversion story is similarly compelling. Jens was introduced the "Centering Prayer" while in prison and has become a deeply spiritual man. His book, "Way of the Prisoner", re-introduced me to the practice of Contemplative Prayer. Jens is now seeking repatration to his native Germany - the German state WANTS him - where his life sentence would be reduced to 2 years. After serving out his sentence in Germany, Jens would like to join a contemplative monastery.
But it's doubtful that will ever happen here in the USA. We have to keep him locked up forever, like countless other inmates, innocent or guilty, who have reformed their lives and are no danger to anyone.
For one thing, do they tell the truth about themselves? Are they honest? Do they acknowledge guilt when they have done wrong?
There are thousands (probably tens of thousands) of people doing HARD time (25+ years) in the United States for non-violent (drug) crimes. The sentencing itself is unjust to begin with.
You can look at a person's prior criminal record as well as their behavioral record while in prison and determine that the vast majority of these people are no danger to anyone. Yet we keep warehousing them.
Then there are people who were wrongly convicted, and there are many more of these than you think. Take a look at the Felony Murder Rule (google it if you don't know what it is).
I don't know where in the world one would find the statistics that you request. I only know of one person (Murph the Surf) who was released because he convinced the powers that be that we was a born again Christian. He turned out to be a manipulator and con artist, but he hasn't committed any more crimes.
Better yet, go to a prison and get to know some of the people and their families who are living this nightmare. Only then can you begin to understand what justice and spirituality are all about.
I am the first to acknowledge that there are dangerous criminals who do need to be imprisoned. But they are such a small percentage of who is incarcerated in this country.
Thanks too for alerting me to the Jens book. You're right, these stories are all too common, and they need to be told.
But I have never heard of a person (other than Murf the Surf, who was playing to a biased board) who has gained release from a sentence because of a religious conversion. It is not the norm anywhere.
The problem in this country are cruel sentences that do not fit the crime.
In Austen's article, Michelle Martin had served her legally mandated time in prison.
Forgiveness requires mutuality on the part of the transgressor and the transgressed. Is that the case here? If it is, very well and very good. Mercy is a decision to go beyond justice, but at the same time is not a replacement for it. The murdered cannot offer forgiveness, but perhaps, if they so choose, their families can.Otherwise, let justice prevail.
If we can't believe in, know, and trust this kind of human transformation, what hope is there for any of us?
"Belgium's most hated woman" ...
What must it be to be the most hated woman in Belgium? What must it be to be accepted by a community of nuns as that most hated woman?
The risk that those women (the nuns) take reminds me of the Algerian Trappist monks.
"she told the court in 2004 that she did not feel "the reflex to save" the girls as they lay starving in the couple's cellar while Dutroux was being held on suspicion of stealing cars"
.... I do wonder if she has the capacity to change her ability (or lack thereof) to empathize with others. Some psychological conditions aren't that changeable, though behavior is.
We all have those psychological characteristics that seemingly are permanent parts of our makeup. Like you, I don't know that they can be changed, but I know that you can get some distance from them so that you can see them for what they are, and not get tripped up by them. Thank God.
Like you, I'll never figure it out. More and more it seems that I can only surrender to God's love.
That's probably why this story of Michelle Martin and the nuns who have opened their community to her seems so important to me. It really is extraordinary and a breakthrough of human consciousness.