SEATTLE (CNS) -- Seattle Archbishop Paul D. Etienne said he will not live in the 9,000-square-foot mansion that many of his predecessors called home.
In a letter sent to archdiocesan priests and deacons Sept. 3 -- his first day as leader of the Archdiocese of Seattle -- the archbishop wrote: "While the Connolly House has been home to the archbishops since 1920, it will not be home for me."
"I prefer to live a more simplified life," he explained, adding that he was "exploring options on church properties" and hoped to find an alternative soon.
"Meanwhile, a prudent discussion will explore the possibility of selling Connolly House to help fund the great many needs across this archdiocese," he wrote.
The property has an appraised value of $8.4 million, according to the King County Department of Assessments.
"The house doesn't represent who I am," Archbishop Etienne said in an interview with Northwest Catholic, news magazine and website for the Archdiocese of Seattle. "I think the days of bishops living in a manner that's a lot nicer than the majority of their people live, those days are gone, and they should be."
"I am a pastor, not a prince," he added, "and I want to live in a manner that's more reflective of how my people live."
Archbishop Etienne said the "model and message of Pope Francis" influenced him. After his election in 2013, the pope made headlines by opting to live in a Vatican guesthouse rather than the Apostolic Palace.
The archbishop said his decision "is not a reflection upon how the previous bishops lived."
"It's not condemning that," he said, "but we're in a different age today, and I want people to know that I'm willing to examine everything -- including the home that I live in that the people of God provide me -- in order to renew this church."
"Bishops face a challenge today of reclaiming our credibility," the archbishop added.
Archbishop Etienne said his decision not to live in the mansion reflects who he is, how he thinks a bishop is called to live and his concern for the environment.
"One guy doesn't need that large of an ecological footprint," he said.
Deciding the future of Connolly House will be "a very collaborative process," Archbishop Etienne said. "That's a discussion that's got to involve a lot more people than me."
At the same time, he said: "It's clearly a piece of real estate that, if we divest of it, can help us advance the ministries of the church."
In 2012, Connolly House was "the only surviving mansion on First Hill still in residential use," according to a booklet from the nonprofit Historic Seattle.
The house, designed by William Spalding, was built in 1902 for William Hofius, the president of a steel and equipment company. The Diocese of Seattle acquired the property in 1920 for Bishop Edward J. O'Dea, who lived there until his death in 1932.
Bishop Gerald Shaughnessy lived in the home next, followed by and Archbishops Thomas A. Connolly, Thomas J. Murphy, Alexander J. Brunett, and J. Peter Sartain, who retired Sept. 3.
Archbishop Raymond G. Hunthausen was the only archbishop who didn't live in the mansion and Archbishop Connolly continued to live there after his retirement until his death in 1991.
Archbishop Murphy named the residence Connolly House in honor of Archbishop Connolly. According to an online history, Archbishop Murphy enjoyed hosting archdiocesan functions there and relished telling people that a neighbor was once heard saying, "I don't know who lives there, but they sure have a lot of parties."
The sometimes-lavish living quarters of church leaders have been the subject of scrutiny in recent years.
In 2014, a German bishop came under fire for spending more than $40 million remodeling his residence and diocesan center, a scandal that earned him the epithet "Bishop of Bling."
That same year, Atlanta Archbishop Wilton D. Gregory, now archbishop of Washington, apologized for building a new $2.2 million residence and agreed to sell it.
In 2018, public backlash moved Bishop Patrick J. McGrath of San Jose, California, to sell a $2.3 million house the diocese had bought for his retirement. Instead, he announced, he would live in a parish rectory.
The Archdiocese of Boston sold its archbishop's residence in 2004 to pay settlements to victims of clergy sexual abuse. Archbishop Etienne said abuse settlements were not a factor in his decisions about Connolly House.
While applauding Archbishop Etienne for forsaking the mansion style, I can't help wondering why it has taken so long for well-placed members of the hierarchy to realize they are just folks and not medieval prince-bishops.
Good. Why don't others do this? 9000 square feet? That's ridiculous. Why did this become the practice at all?
"Meanwhile, a prudent discussion will explore the possibility of selling Connolly House to help fund the great many needs across this archdiocese," he wrote."
It sounds nice, but it may be wiser to use the house to help meet those needs. Space is a great thing to have, and very useful, you just don't need to live in something like that.
Agreed! But zoning restrictions likely would not allow this, so, sell it and buy property to house the homeless. That would TRULY be a Christlike action, beating financial swords into housing ploughshares for the needy. If the Church really wants to claim a connection to Christ they'd be much better to start showing it and to do it now.
Seattle is a very beautiful city, especially in the summer sunlight. It was just made a bit more beautiful by Archbishop Etienne’s decision to give up the mansion. Now he can ride the ferry boat at twilight with the truly sublime view of Seattle’s skyline, full moon glowing above, Space Needle alit, and snow-capped Mt. Rainier in the distance. And people from all walks of life on the ferry boat as well.
Bravo, Archbishop Etienne!
- Todd Witherell
Jesuit Volunteer Corps
Seattle Emergency Housing Service
and Raymond House, 1992-1993
A breath of fresh air...Maybe we can now move, bishop by bishop, away from the "princes of the church" model.