Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsOctober 04, 2016
(iStock photo)

Gone are the days when the main difference between one college dormitory and another was the number of people per room. Today’s college students often are presented with a host of options—from dorms with concierge and housekeeping services to luxury, off-campus apartments. Such accommodations come with a price, however, and the cost of these upscale options often means that the residents of the buildings are far less diverse than the amenities offered to them. When compared with more traditional college housing, the cost of living in residences both on and off campus at many public universities can vary widely. The result has been an increase in both racial and socioeconomic segregation among college students at these universities, even as many students profess their support for diversity.

Establishing a more equitable rent structure for on-campus housing is a good first step toward ensuring more diverse living quarters. But perhaps greater uniformity in the living quarters might also help. While colleges and universities must compete with one another to attract students, the race for the best and newest dorms should not be the main selling point for the college experience. Safe, clean housing is a necessity, but perhaps the resources devoted to luxury upgrades might be better spent on academic and extracurricular programs that, while less noticeable during campus tours, open students’ eyes to a diverse range of viewpoints and provide them with better value for their money in the long run.

More: Education
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Andrew Di Liddo
8 years 4 months ago
Quite a good commentary on dormitory living. My 3 years in a dormitory and fourth year off campus in an apartment with two friends was an incredibly rich experience with a diverse range of viewpoints, interests and endeavors with the people who lived around us. This commentary could be further expanded too specifically to substandard living off campus that many collegiate football players are prone to these days. It used to be that there were dormitories for athletes that were well supervised with adult oversight. Too many athletes go astray today because of unsupervised living off of campus. Also, America Magazine could do a service by shining some light on how university and college athletic programs rarely support themselves and are subsidized by on average a surcharge of $800 per student. With ticket sales, tailgating proceeds, product endorsements and licenses, TV advertising and the whole enchilada that is college football finance needs to be put under some scrutiny. The pendulum has swung too far toward athletics and away from academics on campus.

The latest from america

Is the pope out of danger? No. Is he in danger of death right now? Also no.
Gerard O’ConnellFebruary 21, 2025
Emergency workers carry the body of a person killed during a Russian drone and missile strike Sept. 4, 2024, on residential buildings in Lviv, Ukraine. (OSV News photo/Roman Baluk, Reuters)
The White House began an effort to restore relations with Russia as President Trump repeats Russia’s narrative and talking points about the origins of the war on Ukraine.
Kevin ClarkeFebruary 21, 2025
Joining Ashley and Zac to cover the cosmos on this week’s episode of “Jesuitical” is Guy Consolmagno, S.J., the director of the Vatican Observatory and author of the new book, A Jesuit’s Guide to the Stars: Exploring Wonder, Beauty, and Science.
JesuiticalFebruary 21, 2025
The stories about Catholics that Hollywood tells—and awards—has as much to do with what is happening with the church off-screen as what is shown on-screen.
John DoughertyFebruary 21, 2025