The Catholic Church in the United States has spent a staggering amount of money — close to $4 billion in the past 20 years — to investigate, adjudicate and prevent clergy sex abuse, and to compensate victims for the harm they've suffered.
And as those expenses have prompted dioceses to lay off staff, sell property and liquidate some assets, there is growing evidence that more Catholics across the country are deciding not to contribute to their bishops' diocesan appeals because of the scandals.
"Clearly the leadership failures related to the abuse crisis are a major factor in some of the church's financial problems," said Kim Smolik, CEO of the Leadership Roundtable, a national Catholic organization.
At least 20 dioceses since 2004 have filed for bankruptcy protection to pay their bills and provide financial compensation for clergy sex abuse survivors. On Sept. 12, the Diocese of Rochester in New York became the latest to petition the federal courts for Chapter 11 reorganization.
"This is a very difficult and painful decision," Bishop Salvatore R. Matano of Rochester said during a Sept. 12 news conference. The diocese is facing nearly 50 lawsuits filed in the wake of New York's Child Victims Act, which took effect Aug. 14 and suspended the state's civil statute of limitations in sex abuse cases for one year.
The Catholic Courier, Rochester's diocesan newspaper, reported Bishop Matano as saying that filing for Chapter 11 was "the best and fairest course of action for the victims and for the well-being of the diocese, its parishes, agencies and institutions."
"We believe this is the only way we can provide just compensation for all who suffered the egregious sin of sexual abuse while ensuring the continued commitment of the diocese to the mission of Christ," Bishop Matano said.
The most recent figures compiled by BishopAccountability.org, a website that tracks the bishops' response to the clergy sex abuse scandals, indicates the scandals to date have cost dioceses and religious orders in the United States more than $3.8 billion in total settlements.
And according to data provided by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University, dioceses and religious orders in the 2018 fiscal year incurred almost $302 million in total expenses related to investigating sex abuse allegations, legal fees, victim payments, living costs and therapy for offenders, and operating abuse prevention programs. In the last five fiscal years, those expenses have cost dioceses and religious orders an estimated $1.1 billion, according to CARA figures.
"It's a difficult financial time for the church," Mark Gray, director of CARA Catholic Polls and a senior research associate at CARA, told Catholic News Service.
The dollar amounts of what dioceses have spent only capture a small snapshot of the financial impact the clergy sex abuse scandals have wrought on the church.
"There are other things that are probably happening and very real, but they're not as easily identifiable as a direct result of the abuse crisis," said Pat Markey, executive director of the Diocesan Fiscal Management Conference, an organization that provides fiscal and administrative expertise for the local and national church.
"If someone wants to stop withholding from a capital campaign or the bishop's appeal, it could be because of the abuse crisis, but that's a lot more difficult to make that cause and effect connection," Markey told CNS.
A Pew Research Center survey released this past summer indicated that 26 percent of U.S. Catholics reported giving less money as a result of the recent reports of sexual abuse and misconduct by priests and bishops. Father Jay Mello, a pastor of two parishes in Fall River, Massachusetts, told CNS that his parishioners have been quite "vocal" about not donating to diocesan collections.
"They don't trust the bishops and feel this is the only way they can send the message," Father Mello said.
However, there are no readily available spreadsheets to document the extent that lay Catholics across the board have actually stopped donating to parish collections, bishops' appeals or national collections. The data is anecdotal, and often varies from parish to parish, even within the same diocese.
"In terms of dollar for dollar week to week, anecdotally I haven't seen a real fluctuation. My fear however is that five to 10 years from now is when it will be felt as those who contribute fade away and aren't replaced by anyone," said Father Bryan Small, pastor of Sts. Peter and Paul Church in Atlanta. Father Small told CNS he fears the abuse scandals have pushed away future parish council presidents and other lay leaders.
Gray, of CARA, said there is a perception the church "should be like Walmart" and have a national spreadsheet and financial report. However, he noted that religious institutes, individual parishes, Catholic social service agencies and other diocesan entities have their own budgets and financial systems.
"There is nothing that aggregates all those figures and then releases it publicly," Gray said. "It's always been a bit of a blind spot for the church. There is just no way to connect all the dots and fill in all the information. One diocese may report one set of financials that may not match what is publicly reported by another diocese."
Matt Manion, faculty director of the Center for Church Management at Villanova University's School of Business, identified three major financial impacts from the clergy sex abuse scandals: Chapter 11 filings and settlement payments for sex abuse survivors, the potential losses in donations and collections, as well as the expenses of litigation and other related administrative responses to the crisis.
"That's time that could have been spent on other parts of the church's mission," Manion told CNS.
The settlements that dioceses have given to clergy sex abuse survivors have prompted many of them to liquidate assets and shrink operating budgets. In some 2018 diocesan financial reports and accompanying documents, church officials admit the settlements have impacted their ability to carry out the works of evangelization and ministry.
"To be certain, the crisis has had an ongoing impact on the church's ability to invest in its mission," Bishop Frank J. Caggiano of Bridgeport, Connecticut, told the Fairfield County Catholic, the diocesan newspaper, when the diocese released its 2018 financial report.
Jerry Topczewski, chief of staff for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, which filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2011 and emerged from the process in 2015, said the archdiocese over the years sold its pastoral center, liquidated property that had been set aside for a cemetery and future parish sites, and cut its staff by more than 45 percent.
"You start cutting things when you can, and when you are a service organization, like a central office of a diocese is, it's people who are the bulk of our budget," said Topczewski. He told CNS the Chapter 11 process enabled the archdiocese to maintain day-to-day operations while creating an equitable system that distributed $21 million to 355 priest-abuse survivors and established a $500,000 fund to cover victims' personal therapy expenses.
"It's all been quite the strategic pivot that all began with Chapter 11," Topczewski said. "When you don't have two dimes to rub together, you've got to figure out what to do."
In the past year and a half, at least four Catholic dioceses — the St. Cloud and Winona-Rochester dioceses in Minnesota, the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, New Mexico, and New York's Rochester Diocese — have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In letters to the faithful and via news conferences, the bishops in those dioceses cited the need to provide financial compensation to victims while keeping the mission of the local church alive.
"We could see where this was all leading and the trajectory wasn't changing. We just don't have any money. If we're not here, we can't help anybody," Archbishop John C. Wester of Santa Fe said during a November 2018 news conference in New Mexico, the Albuquerque Journal reported.
Manion, of the Center for Church Management, said Chapter 11 in theory has the benefit of keeping the diocese up and running while it goes through a plan of reorganization. The process also can create a compensation fund that enables abuse survivors to be compensated fairly.
"The victims are all evaluated together, so it's not like the first ones in get the most money," Manion said. "Chapter 11 creates a steady fund so all claimants are evaluated in a consistent fashion, so there is the potential for this to be a more fair way for the claimants than doing it on a case by case basis."
Each diocese has its own set of financial realities when deciding whether to file for bankruptcy protection, according to Smolik, of the Leadership Roundtable, which promotes best practices and accountability in management, finances, communications and human resource development for the church in the U.S.
Noting the recent Pew Research Center survey, Smolik said the apparent drop in giving appears to be connected to the twin crises of clergy sexual abuse and the failure of church leadership.
"I think Catholics are concerned about how their contributions are being used, and it's important that dioceses move toward greater accountability, transparency and co-responsibility, in terms of their financial affairs," Smolik said.
In February, the Leadership Roundtable convened the Catholic Partnership Summit, a gathering of more than 200 Catholic lay leaders and clergy. From the summit, it released a report, "Healing the Body of Christ," which is a plan to develop a new culture of leadership in the church and a new response to the abuse crisis.
The report urged church leaders to "provide full financial transparency regarding all aspects of the (abuse) crisis, include how donations are used." The report also called upon bishops to "build a broad, deep, and transparent financial management and accounting system."
Said Smolik, "We're going to have to look at new models at how the church is served."
I don't give what I used to give but due to sexism.
For starters I won't support the permanent diaconate at all, or Pro-Life, so that means no giving anymore to Catholic Charities. If they separated out these two sections I might consider giving again. I don't feel I should pay for the education or training of priests if I unjustly am kept from ordination. If I am not good enough then my hard-earned cash isn't either.
I do give at the parish level but carefully now, unlike how I used to give. I listen to the homily and if there is a hint of egotism, sexism, arrogance, that basket gets 2 cents because that is what servants get paid who are poor workers. If it does not contain any sexism but doesn't challenge or stand up for women either then I give the basic 5-10 dollars. If the homily is really good and brave and actually stands up for equal treatment and sacraments in our church for women - that homily gets at least $20 and likely much more, if I have it on me. If a priest is hungry, maybe he will start asking himself why no one is giving or why his church is empty now when it used to be full. Perhaps he will ask himself is there any injustice that he could have helped to stop? Could he have made a difference but chose not to, instead choosing to play it safe?
Sadly, money talks even in church. What other voice do the laity have, and even when you withhold funds, these bishops don't listen or they intentionally misconstrue what is being protested against.
Sexism leads to child sexual abuse. It is time to kill two nasty birds with one stone: both unequal ordination practices against women, and clericalism driven pedophilia.
time for RCC to be held accountable like all non-profits and be required to publish annual financial reports--why have they been given such privileged treatment by the States?
The missing piece of this puzzle misunderstands that we are all victims, not only of pedophilia abuse, or sexual abuse, or other administrative abuse, but brotherly abuse - that which erodes or evaporates Trust. When any relationship loses trust the only thing that is left is process, the unloving actions where people simply go through the motions. Until Church Hierarchy comes clean, we won't even begin to heal, because there is nothing to build upon. It is not sufficient for a good priest to say "I am not involved, I am not an abuser." When there is no communication, there is no understanding, there is no way to join hands any more. Our Church is not our Pastor and certainly not our unaccountable Bishop. Our Church is Christ and we the Laity deserve to be part of it. Reform has to come from within and it must always begin with reconciliation. Jesus did not give a piece of himself, he gave everything and left nothing, to die naked on a Cross. He gave his heart, every drop of his life's blood in the hope of unlocking our hearts. With nothing changing, with no humility in sight the only way the church can revolt is to deny the only resource the Laity have. Maybe, just maybe, your Pastor or Bishop will ask, "What will you have me do?"
Newark is a huge Diocese and many there withhold money from the Bishops yearly appeal because the retired Bishop doubled the size of a donated mansion for himself alone on 18 acres with an inground pool and now interior water oriented facilities and it has non exempt property taxes of probably c.26K....so where is that coming from. Then the new Bishop had a Mass for lgbt known couples. So the retired Bishop was allegedly conservative and the new one is pro gay.....so sex abuse may actually be the least of Newark’s funding problem....two Bishops are the funding problem.
I give no money to the church anymore because they could be using it for anything from supporting pedophile priests to upgrading their Candy Crush computer games (no kidding: http://www.eyeofthetiber.com/2015/11/05/leaked-documents-reveal-vatican-officials-blew-entire-peters-pence-on-beanie-babies/). I give money directly to charities like The American Red Cross.